Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John R. (Bob) Locke
But if Allard loses to some Demonrat, and that means Pat Leahy can block pro-life justices as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, what does that accomplish? I'll take a fair percentage of perfect from a guy.

Could you live with putting some Pat Schroeder wanna-be in place of Allard or Campbell? They vote pretty well on the issues. Not perfect, but far better than some Denver or Boulder liberal. Is making a point worth a far-left Senator?

263 posted on 12/13/2001 10:11:13 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]


To: hchutch
Is making a point worth a far-left Senator?

The basic debate here is pragmatism versus idealism. I'm of the latter. I'm more than willing to accept some short-term losses if the probability of long-term gains exists. In my opinion, they do.

And in my book, voting against the Constitution on a regular basis makes for an unacceptable candidate. Can I live with some things? Yes. But I have drawn a certain line and am not willing to cross it. Others have as well, though it's considerably to the left of where I stand. Those are in the pragmatist camp.

The pragmatists call the idealists "stupid" for not being willing to settle for what they can get.

The idealists think the pragmatists are a bunch of "sellouts".

Each of us needs to be right in our own mind.

274 posted on 12/13/2001 10:17:55 AM PST by John R. (Bob) Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson