Posted on 12/12/2001 12:48:32 PM PST by dhuffman@awod.com
NEW YORK (December 12, 2001 6:15 a.m. EST) - From his position near Tora Bora, Afghanistan, Fox News Channel correspondent Geraldo Rivera seemed more agitated by a question about carrying a gun than by the mortar rounds that just exploded nearby. "I refuse to address that issue," said Rivera, speaking into a satellite phone. "It's been blown way out of proportion. It makes me sound like a tabloid talk show host goes to war. It's so unfair." Yet Rivera's decision to bring a gun into a war zone where eight journalists have been killed has raised questions about whether it's a proper - or wise - thing for a reporter to do. Many reporters say that carrying a gun is risky because soldiers would be less likely to believe a claim that someone is a journalist, making them potential targets. "If the word gets out that a journalist is carrying a gun, it makes it difficult for everyone," said Peter Arnett, a former war correspondent for The Associated Press and CNN. Rivera, speaking on Fox News Channel last week, said that "if they're going to get us, it's going to be in a gunfight." But when asked specifically by an anchor whether he had a gun, he was reluctant to talk about it, finally nodding yes. He's traveling with two guards who have five guns between them, Fox spokesman Robert Zimmerman said. Rivera isn't necessarily carrying a gun in most situations, but has one readily available, he said. While filming a report last week, Rivera ducked after a sniper fired a few shots in his direction. "There are eight journalists already dead," he said. "I almost got killed last Thursday and, believe me, it wasn't because of a story in the New York Post that I was carrying a gun. This is a very dangerous place. "That makes me feel ill, that suddenly it's become an issue that I'm putting journalists at risk," he said. "That's complete bull." NBC forbids its correspondents from carrying firearms. ABC won't discuss its security arrangements. CBS and CNN said none of their personnel carries weapons, but it isn't a formal policy. Steve Bell, a telecommunications professor at Ball State University who covered Vietnam for ABC News, doubts he'd be alive today if he were carrying a gun when captured by Viet Cong soldiers in Cambodia in 1970. He sat in a car while his Vietnamese co-workers convinced the soldiers that Bell was a journalist, not a CIA agent. "If I had been carrying a weapon, I doubt if that argument would have gone over well," Bell said. Former CBS anchorman Walter Cronkite, who covered World War II for United Press International, said all journalists he knew then adhered to Geneva Convention rules that they should not carry weapons. Novelist Ernest Hemingway, who covered World War II as a reporter, angered fellow journalists in August 1944 when he joined a band of French resistance fighters. They were concerned about him blurring lines between journalists and soldiers. Hemingway kept firearms, bazookas and grenades in his hotel in Paris, leading to an appearance before a military panel on allegations he was violating Geneva Convention rules concerning news correspondents. He claimed the weapons were in his room only because the military lacked storage space. Carrying a gun could make soldiers "look at reporters, particularly American reporters, as some kind of opponent," said Arnett, who is heading to Afghanistan soon as a correspondent for an independent production company. "The whole point of being a journalist is to be detached." Arnett said he hoped Rivera is trained in using a weapon. "I wouldn't want to be near him if he opened up," he said. As a young reporter in Vietnam, Arnett admitted to occasionally carrying a weapon before he was convinced it was unwise. He hasn't since, he said. Even if the journalists themselves are not armed, many news organizations - including The Associated Press - have hired armed guards for their personnel in particularly dangerous areas of Afghanistan. Expensive news equipment is considered tempting to thieves. "I can understand wanting to have a bodyguard," said Alex Jones, director of the Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University. "I think I would prefer to have someone with experience both locally and experience in their kind of battlegrounds and keep my focus on doing my job." But Jones said he wouldn't criticize a reporter who feels safer armed. "I can understand both sides of the argument," Jones said. "What I can't understand is if you're carrying a gun and talking about it." Rivera and Fox News Channel have both been outspoken in support of the U.S. war effort. Rivera, who left his CNBC talk show because he wanted to cover the war, has talked about killing Osama bin Laden if he had the opportunity. He's less willing to talk about his own personal security. "I haven't had a shower in two weeks and I have to defend whether I'm carrying a six-shooter?" he said. "It's just ridiculous."
Breaking from MSNBC being in Afghanistan not as risky as carrying a gun. Typical liberal reaction. (In whiney liberal high screachy voice) "If you would lay down your gun they would see that you are not a threat and leave you alone."
First is where and how did Geraldo buy this handgun? Did he purchase it legally? New York and New Jersey are a bit sticky over this. If he did buy it in New York, he is not allowed to have it in NYC. Second is how did he transport this handgun? I would assume he carried it accross state lines without a permit. Third is what will he do with it when he returns? He cannot show up @JFK with his handgun he bought in Afghanistan. If he flew chartered aircraft, he is going to have a tough time since he has bragged about it, he must declare it on his customs arrival sheet. Nobody is allowed out of the plane until customs say's it's ok.
Translation: I'll be happy to pay someone to give his life for my sorry butt because I am too much of a wuss to do it myself.
Agreed, but the bigger maroons are the slack-jawed groupies on this site who are suckers for this egomaniac.
Geraldo has no "ideology" outside himself.
The only reason he was such a staunch defender of serial adulterer Clinton, is, he is one himself.
It's funny to see all the morons who take his staged "news" reports seriously.
And to think, some so-called "conservatives" here complain about news manipulation.
Geraldo is a fine "journalist" if you consider Weekly World News a credible source.
Sorry. Not buying it. The dude is a stooge and for conservatives to jump at this bait job is pretty ridiculous. He's just whoring for attention and credibility.
The Black Panther Party types exercise that option. Does that make them good?
We conservatives laugh at knee-jerk liberals, but it seems some of us are aping them here: "Geraldo on NBC, bad....Geraldo on Fox, must be good".
Geraldo is a man who's situation makes the man. The chair incident, the Howard Stern underpants tape he made, Al Capone's Vault, his pathetic butt-boy stint on MSNBC, and so on. Conservatives who have suddenly found him better watch out, the hook might be set at any moment once he comes home and his expense report clears Murdoch's desk.
...MachineGun-Carrying JOE GALLOWAY who fought at Landing Zone X-Ray/Battle of IA DRANG-1965 =
... War Coorespondant =
...YES
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.