Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can somebody sedate this woman? (Mary Frances Berry)
Jewish World Review ^ | Dec. 12, 2001 | Linda Chavez

Posted on 12/12/2001 5:39:11 AM PST by SJackson

MARY FRANCES BERRY, the chairman of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, is a bully. Her most recent escapade -- last Friday -- involved her refusal to seat Peter Kirsanow, the man appointed by President Bush to a commission seat that became vacant on Nov. 29. Berry told White House counsel Al Gonzales he'd better send federal marshals if he wanted Kirsanow to take his lawful place on the commission.

But her outrageous behavior in this incident is nothing new. I've watched her in action for years, even before President Reagan appointed me staff director, the chief executive officer of the commission, in 1983 when she served as vice chairman. She once bullied a member of the commission staff so badly -- in words not fit to print in a family newspaper -- I had to threaten to have her removed from the building.

"Your use of intimidating curses and vile language as well as your overall abuse of a subordinate go far beyond permissible behavior," I informed her in a memo. "If you repeat such abusive behavior in the future, I will ask you to remove yourself from the premises and will seek to have you removed if you do not comply."

"Call It Uncivil" The New York Times dubbed the conflict, one of many in our stormy tenure together.

Berry was first appointed to the commission in 1980, largely to get rid of her at the then Department of Health, Education and Welfare, where she served as an assistant secretary. Berry had embarrassed the Carter administration by returning from a trip to China extolling the Maoist education system there, including its use of ethnic quotas in higher education. So President Carter passed over Berry when he created the new Department of Education, shipping her off to the Civil Rights Commission instead. She's been getting even with presidents ever since.

In 1983, President Reagan fired Berry and two other commissioners. At the time, commissioners were appointed to serve "at the pleasure of the president," like all presidential appointees of executive branch departments and agencies. But Berry refused to go -- until I changed the locks on the door.

She then went to court to fight her removal, and got a favorable ruling from a liberal District Court judge. But in the meantime, the Congress re-wrote the law, authorizing the president to appoint four commissioners for six-year terms and Congressional leaders to appoint an additional four members with the same conditions, thus mooting her court case, which had moved to the U.S. Court of Appeals by then.

...snip....

President Clinton appointed her chairman when he took office, but even he had reservations about Berry. When he decided to initiate what he called a "national dialogue on race," he kept Berry out of the picture, appointing a whole new commission to oversee the enterprise.

President Clinton also appointed Victoria Wilson on Jan. 13, 2000, to fill the unexpired term of a commissioner who had died. The presidential appointment Wilson received clearly states her term expired Nov. 29, 2001. It's Wilson's place Kirsanow should have taken last week after President Bush appointed him and he was sworn in by a federal judge. But Berry believes she -- not President Bush nor President Clinton -- determines when commissioners' terms expire.

The White House says they'll take Berry to court to force her to seat Kirsanow. The president ought to fire Berry at the same time. As long as this issue is going to wind up in the courts, why not settle the question left unanswered in 1983? Since when did the Constitution permit Congress to limit the president's right to appoint and remove officers of executive branch agencies anyway?

Click for Complete Article


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 12/12/2001 5:39:11 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Sedate her? Are you kidding? I was about to build her a huge stage with state of the art sound system so the world could see just how pitiful a racist she is ... another pride and joy of the Democratic party. LOL!
2 posted on 12/12/2001 5:47:41 AM PST by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Mary Frances Berry

.

Is THIS her?

3 posted on 12/12/2001 5:50:50 AM PST by kinsman redeemer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer
yes. Here is some bio.
4 posted on 12/12/2001 5:51:59 AM PST by kinsman redeemer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"Since when did the Constitution permit Congress to limit the president's right to appoint and remove officers of executive branch agencies anyway?"

The SCOTUS has held that the President does have the Constitutional authority to remove appointees, incuding those appointed/confirmed by the Senate. The bigger question is it Constitutional for Congress to appoint officers of the Executive branch?

5 posted on 12/12/2001 5:59:02 AM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: kinsman redeemer
EVIL personified.
7 posted on 12/12/2001 6:08:54 AM PST by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 4ConservativeJustices
>>The SCOTUS has held that the President does have the Constitutional authority to remove appointees, incuding those appointed/confirmed by the Senate. The bigger question is it Constitutional for Congress to appoint officers of the Executive branch?

This, however, in no way also grants the President the balls to do what he thinks is right. He either has them or he doesn't.

8 posted on 12/12/2001 6:13:30 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer
Bulldog Berry. That "glamour shot" scares me!
9 posted on 12/12/2001 6:16:20 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer
Is THIS her?

No way, dude. I know Malcolm X when I see him.
10 posted on 12/12/2001 6:17:55 AM PST by Xenalyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
This "woman" is disgusting. What was it Cheney, "it's time for them to go"? Well might it be "Time for Her to Go?"
11 posted on 12/12/2001 6:19:22 AM PST by Soaring Feather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bentfeather
Ditto.................
12 posted on 12/12/2001 6:22:21 AM PST by unojook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

What you talkin' 'bout Willis?

Embarrassing Berry - Incivility on the U.S. Civil Rights Commission ~ WSJ.


civil rights panel meeting

.

13 posted on 12/12/2001 6:22:57 AM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
HOW ABOUT SIGN IDEAS TO PICKET MARY F*RTFACE BERRY?

--SUCH AS [please add your own!!!]

--"VOTE!--MF BERRY 4 PRESIDENT OF PSYCHOTICS UNANONMYMOUS!"

--MF BERRY--4 PRES OF THE COMMIECRATIC STABLE BOYS

--MFBERRY--4 LEAD MULE MASCOT OF THE COMMIECRATIC PARTY

--MFBERRY--4 THE NEXT AVAILABLE EXORCISM!

--MFBERRY--AWARDED PRIZE 4 GREATEST VACUUM BETWEEN 2 EARS

--MFBERRY WOULD MARRY OSAMA BL IF SHE COULD STAND MEN

--MFBERRY HAS OWN MODEST PROPOSAL FOR WHITE BABIES

--MFBERRY NOMINATED AS EXPERIMENTAL ELEPHANT'S DIAPER

--MFBERRY ADDICTED TO HER OWN ARROGANCE

--MFBERRY LOST WHILE RETURNING TO TOILET 2 FIND HER BRAINS

--MFBERRY GOES WHERE NO HUMAN HAS GONE B4 N2 DEPTHS OF PATHETIC.

--MFBERRY WOULD LIKE TO PRETEND TO BE HUMAN AS SOON AS SHE CAN UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT.

--MFBERRY SEES ONLY RED, SPEAKS ONLY READ, HEARS ONLY RED, IS RED ONLY.

--MFBERRY WOULD SUPPORT CIVIL RIGHTS IF SHE COULD WRAP HER VACUUM HEAD AROUND THE CONCEPT OF "CIVIL" AND FIGURE OUT HOW TO SPELL "RIGHT"

-MFBERRY LEADER IN THE UNMERRY DESTRUCTION OF USA

--MFBERRY COLLECTING FUNDS FOR FARE TO RETURN HER AS AN OBSCURE VILLAGE'S IDIOT.

--MFBERRY HER EFFORTS 2 THINK WOULD RESULT IN GEARS HORRIBLY GRINDING IF THERE WERE GEARS TO GRIND.

--MFBERRY SHE'D TALK IF SHE COULD GET THE ELEPHANT'S FOOT OUT OF HER MOUTH.

--MFBERRY PROUD EVEN OF HER SUPREME IDIOCY.

--MFBERRY NEVER SAW A TYRANNY SHE DIDN'T WANT TO LEAD.

--MFBERRY

14 posted on 12/12/2001 6:23:22 AM PST by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4ConservativeJustices
bump
15 posted on 12/12/2001 6:24:36 AM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Anyone know when her 6 years are up? If she was re-appointed in '93, why is she still there?
16 posted on 12/12/2001 6:26:36 AM PST by USAF_ret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Let's pump her full of Haldol. That should leave her blithering incoherent drivel....um, nevermind.
17 posted on 12/12/2001 6:26:41 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
Oh, my Lord, you are SO right! Now who'll be Willis?
18 posted on 12/12/2001 6:30:38 AM PST by Xenalyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Sedate? We are talking a tranquilizer gun with enough drugs to take down at least 2 African Elephants - and thats just to get her to ease up enough to drag her from the room!
19 posted on 12/12/2001 6:41:44 AM PST by Clintons Are White Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
Well, maybe after 21 Jul 1788 (9th state ratified), or closer to 4 Mar 1789 (officially took effect). But since Congress does not have the power to appoint, I would have to agree with the Constitution and say never.
20 posted on 12/12/2001 6:53:44 AM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson