[William Wallace]

Clearly you are incapable of disagreeing with someone without resorting to personal attacks.

[A.J.Armitage]

Clearly you are incapable of disagreeing with someone without resorting to personal attacks.

!

This from someone cheering on a post consisting of a long argument against the worth of a dying (now dead) person's life because that person holds views she didn't like.

And the "THEY" aren't some vague bogeyman. At the time, the top ones were named Bill Clinton and Janet Reno.

[Twodees]

Let's dig into your history of discussion tactics, shall we, Willie? I seem to remember that you actually pulled a stunt with open tags which would have gotten you banned had you been ratted out for it.

There's a Bush photo swoonfest thread somewhere. I trust that you can find it on your own.

[SusanUSA]

choke

"Clearly you are incapable of disagreeing with someone without resorting to personal attacks."

May I refer you, sir, to your post #59. Please re-read it with these words of yours in mind.

[zip]

Clearly you are incapable of disagreeing with someone without resorting to personal attacks

Excellent reply, but WW, there you go again - debating against "feelings". Don't you just feel how bad the government is?