Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: right_to_defend
Does that mean since he's not covered from head to toe in weeping, open wounds, everything is OK?

I think the idea is that if he's not showing any symptoms (fever and all those other early symptoms), then he is not contagious and even if he is infected, he is still in the incubation period.

But they're not letting him go until they do a further diagnosis.

-penny

180 posted on 12/07/2001 3:03:11 PM PST by Penny1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: Penny1
Bumping for home.
181 posted on 12/07/2001 3:04:15 PM PST by abner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

To: Penny1; Dixie Mom
You two are absolutely correct regarding the transmission of smallpox. According to the CDC:

Because smallpox can only be transmitted from the time of the earliest appearance of rash, early detection of cases and prompt vaccination of all contacts is critical.

Also, an interesting piece of information from an aricle from Fox News:

The researchers cite the last case of naturally occurring smallpox in October 1977 as further evidence of the difficulty for one person to infect others. Of the 161 persons who had contact with the infected person, 12 unvaccinated persons had face-to-face contact. None of the 12 became ill with clinical cases of smallpox.

Unfortunately, there are some around here needlessly trying to scare people. Smallpox is a relatively easy disease to identify, and it is only contagious once the rash appears.

199 posted on 12/07/2001 3:12:20 PM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson