Because he was in a plane crash in which there were no survivors. Just a thought.
You want Howlin to prove that he WASN'T murdered. You can't prove a negative. The burden is on you to prove that he was murdered.
So what's YOUR theory?
(1) Clinton somehow learned that Brown was going to rat on him to save his own neck? Where's the evidence for that?
(2) Did Clinton order the pilot to crash the plane or was that a lucky break for him? But somehow Ron Brown survived the plane crash, so Clinton dispatched a hit team to finish him off? Is that what happened?
(3) Did he send a second hit team to dispatch the first hit team in case one of those guys talked? But wait, what if the second team talked?
I'm all ears.
Because he was in a plane crash in which there were no survivors. Just a thought.
DISINFORMATION. In fact, there were ACCORDING TO THE GOVERNMENT two survivors OF THE CRASH. One was the stewardess that the government admitted too. After surviving the crash and many hours on the ground, she died in route to the hospital under a doctor's care. And curiously enough, they cremated her body BEFORE even notifying her relatives that she had died. That, by the way, is a violation of Air Force regulations. The government has never admitted to more than the one survivor but (guess who) Klayman, via a FOIA request, discovered a confidential timeline given to Warren Christopher, then Secretary of State, which has an entry from Abe Sockowitz (good friend of Johnny Huang, Chinese spy) from the crash site which states there were TWO survivors. And just after that information arrived at State, they shut down all access to the crash site by reporters.
You want Howlin to prove that he WASN'T murdered. You can't prove a negative. The burden is on you to prove that he was murdered.
I don't want Howlin to PROVE he wasn't murdered. I want her to say why she BELIEVES he wasn't murdered. Many times I've posted to Howlin the material I'm about to post to you. NOT ONCE has Howlin offered ANYTHING to dispute a single item in the list. NOT ONCE.
A while back, I asked Howlin if she had ever posted that she doesn't believe Ron Brown was murdered. She responded NO, trying to give the "conservative" impression to those who were following that thread that she does believe he was murdered. Then I proved she was lying by posting a statement she made in an earlier thread where she stated quite clearly that she did NOT believe he was murdered. All I'm asking her to do is explain why she believes that, given that she won't challenge a SINGLE item I've listed in the case (which I'm about to supply you).
I'm all ears.
Let's see if you really are or if you are going to RUN like ALL the other "move-on'ers" have done when faced with this list. Read the next post from me. Visit the sources to confirm that I'm not "making this up". Then dispute ANY items in the post, IF YOU CAN. Pay particular attention to the opinions of the photographer and pathologists at AFIP and elsewhere who state that the wound looked like a bullet wound and that Brown should have been autopsied. Address the photo and x-ray evidence that seems to cooberate that opinion. Explain the LIES of AFIP management with regards to the opinions of their staff and the nature of the evidence. Explain why the Air Force skipped the Safety Board and why the AIB report doesn't even mention the opinions of it experts at AFIP or the evidence suggesting a bullet wound. Explain why the Air Force report doesn't mention the loss of transponder signal when the plane was still 8 miles from the crash site. Explain why the Air Force NEVER told the families of the victims about the pathologist opinions or the x-ray suggesting a bullet ... but instead just destroyed their careers? Explain ANYTHING ... if you dare.