Replies

In the manner in which you refer to Clarity ... please either use Jim's words in this matter (with his permission, if needed) or avoid the subject.

You have portrayed him as "the bad guy" after a huge amount of support from him for Jim and FR.

I cannot make the citations of JIM'S explanations ... but I surely do remember the gist of them and still don't feel that Clarity is being treated fairly here at all ... so no matter what your appointed or select position with FR is, my friend (and I do not call you that in any less than honest way) ... the subject of Clarity and FR cannot be reduced to so few words -- "all in favor of Jim and his causes (ours)" without presentation of the whole story as given by Jim, himself.

It is, or should be, wrong to give others any reasons to dislike or distrust or denigrate Clarity ... or to assign such a burden of guilt to be laid upon him, who has always been ... another "friend".