As I understand it, you believe the rapid advance of technology has recently undermined the historical effectiveness of gold as a store of value and that the same applies to any other possible commodity or basket of commodities.
You go on to express a preference for private currencies that you purport partially resolve the problems that these advances of technology have introduced. You offer a single sentence regarding this preference and I must confess an inability to follow it. Specifically, you say:
Personally, I think that an options market on assets as stores of value for competing, insured, private currencies is a partial answer to the problem.
Please elaborate. I have no idea what this means. More importantly, I understand neither the nature of, nor the rationale for, the private currencies to which you refer.