Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Hitler being man of the year served its purpose. Please read the excerpt from Time in 1938: Hitler: Man Of Year 1938

Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and I think that it is much better to highlight the activities and effects of these maniacs than to sweep them under the rug like the Clintons and their complicit media cronies did. Hitler was affecting the world in 1938 and Time tried to get fat, lazy Americans to see this, to no avail.

In my opinion, Osama bin Laden should be Man of the Year 2001. And hopefully it will be a posthumous award in dishonor of his notoriety.

49 posted on 11/29/2001 2:06:29 PM PST by tgiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tgiles
Considering that Man of the Year is the person who had the greatest effect on the news this year. Yes, the Passengers on Flight 93 were heroic, but I think the title (Its not an award) should go to Bin Laden. He set this whole thing in motion, and it definately affected this year.
50 posted on 11/29/2001 3:03:33 PM PST by walrus954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson