A true conservative would never hit the abuse button under the assumption that management failed to act on a perceived posting violation.
No, they'd either challenge the poster in the public arena of ideas or silently slip into the night.
I find it interesting that Pubbies claim to desire free market competition, but when political competition is presented, they become the ultimate protectionists.
Sad stuff...
PS: I gave Dubya an “A +” for his wartime leadership.
Trying for a little logic here...why do you think that abuse button is there? Do you think Jim has time to read every post on this forum? How is he to know there is an abuse if there is no report..Miss Cleo?
If I were a REAL snitch, I would have reported the many abusive private replies I have received. I have not done so.
The permanant banning of Arator was not due to my report. He incurred a temporary banning due to something I reported, and was then reinstated. I am unaware of why he was permanently banned...perhaps that is explained in a previous reply on this thread, but I haven't read the entire thread. However, because I informed him that I had hit the abuse button in that instance, I am the person he has fixated on as the reason for his ban.
If I were one who pulled the trigger on everyone I disagreed with, have you never wondered why YOU are still here? Logic, logic!
I am glad you approve of the President's handling of the war. I believe eventually you will approve of some other things as well. (Feel free to discount that as optimism from the Head Bushie Cheerleader. LOL!)
Regards,
Miss Marple