[A Navy Vet]

It's possible he came by it through NNLB via Eschoir at TTC/AFWA, or Eschoir directly. Eschoir optained a lot of personal imformation through his discovery in the lawsuit. Just my opinion.

[A Navy Vet]

Eschoir claims he has burned a CD of his discovery and has offered it to the anti-Freepers.

[Inspector Harry Callahan]

Er, methinks you have no idea what you're talking about. Just a hunch....

http://forums.delphiforums.com/frureform/messages?msg=665.1

[Solson]

Actually, it came from Brian himself.

[Arator]

Here's an eye-opening gem I just received from Clarity:

Just one more thought or two:

If your lawyer ran up a hundred large without your consent, wouldn't you ban him AT LEAST?

And second, if you had a hundred large payable, and you wanted to run another snookerthon, wouldn't you allow people to think the payable had been incurred without your knowledge? And if some uninformed or malevolent, or both, poster, say Arator, posted that your lawyer was a scoundrel who had hoodwinked you for his own personal aims, mightn't you just let it be? Gosh, it could even improve the fundraising. Imagine that!

Have I been played? Very possibly. My apologies to Clarity and Clinton's a Liar for my presumption about the whole Esky suit matter. Obviously, none of us outside of the parties directly involved have all the facts. It was wrong of me to draw hasty conclusions based on scant and possibly one-sided information.