To: thatsnotnice
"The California Highway Patrol turned down our application to armor-plate the cabs," I find this very odd as well. Am I to understand that in CA you have to "apply" to have your vehicle armor-plated? WTF is the logic behind that bit of absurdity?
5 posted on
11/28/2001 2:58:25 PM PST by
AAABEST
To: AAABEST
Am I to understand that in CA you have to "apply" to have your vehicle armor-plated? WTF is the logic behind that bit of absurdity?
The same kind of "logic" that prevents you from carrying a weapon for self-protection.
To: AAABEST
Am I to understand that in CA you have to "apply" to have your vehicle armor-plated? WTF is the logic behind that bit of absurdity?"When armor-plated cars are outlawed, only outlaws will have armor-plated cars." Obviously. They don't want Al Capone to have an impregnable rolling fortress.
And, as we all know, <sarcasm>
laws are effective against outlaws.</sarcasm>
To: AAABEST
WTF is the logic behind that bit of absurdity? I had the same initial reaction. Then I thought of those LA bank robbers in body armor who held off an entire SWAT team for the better part of a day.
Same principle. And a reasonable principle. But poorly applied. I don't think we have to worry about these folks robbing a bank.
To: AAABEST
Am I to understand that in CA you have to "apply" to have your vehicle armor-plated? Who would be most likely to do it? You, or the Crips and Bloods?
87 posted on
11/29/2001 1:00:15 PM PST by
Ditto
To: AAABEST
Its a violation of the rights of criminals to shoot someone without impediments...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson