There were 3 shots. Nixon wasn't there at the time. The bubble only kept out rain, not bullets. Nixon didn't taunt him about it.
Then there are the railroad bums caught behind the grassy knoll. Their arrest records disappeared, but there is one great photograph of them. One looks just like E. Howard Hunt. Another like Frank Sturgis. Both of them Nixon men. The third one looks like Woody Harrelson's dad, a known shooter.
The arrest records are public documents, their names are known. They were three bums.
If you can explain away 20-50 gross conflicts in the official version, then anyone with an IQ greater than his belt size will find 200 more conflicts.
It is a basic truth in any complex case that you can find all kinds of open questions or things that don't make sense by themselves. Look at the OJ case. Does that mean he didn't really do it? No. A question is just a question, it isn't evidence. The evidence says Oswald did it. It says that convincingly. The ability to ask questions doesn't subtract it. The fact is, many of the questions are false questions, as are many of the "facts" being offered in this thread right now. This has happened because for 38 years we've had people writing nonsensical books, repeating false assertions and making up stories. Nobody can be blamed for thinking there is something to them, but if you do the work to find out you'll find there isn't.
One eyewitness was asked why she didn't come forward for years. She said, "I didn't want to die of suicide, a shotgun blast to the back of my head, if you know what I mean."
Oswald's relationship with the intelligence community is interesting by itself. Kennedy's relationship to the Mob is now well known. So is his father's working with the Mob. Then there is the Mob girlfriend - Exner. And the Mob boss who died as this was coming out. Like I said, too many conflicts in the official story.