To: Tymesup
The republished book attracts attention - it is number one on the Amazon list of Crenshaw books, while the old version is number 45. Is this enough reason to kill Crenshaw? Maybe, maybe not. Again, the book is out. His death didn't change this. In fact, he got more attention by dying. Where is the logic in using this as a motive to kill him?
I saw the bit about JAMA. Court cases like this turn on more than whether he was telling the truth. He wasn't. That case doesn't change the fact.
132 posted on
11/28/2001 11:37:55 AM PST by
mlo
To: mlo
Perhaps a message not to talk was being sent to everyone else. Remember Carlos G (I won't try to spell his last name), who analyzed the FLIR tapes from Waco. He died before he could publicize his results. Has anyone else volunteered to replicate his analysis? Anyone smart enough to do what he did is smart enough to realize this was a very dangerous job.
133 posted on
11/28/2001 1:09:13 PM PST by
Tymesup
To: mlo
What Crenshaw forgot was that the doctors, the real doctors, were still around to call him a liar. And they did it on talk shows right after the book came out. One of the reasons that the book was on the bargain table as soon as it came out along the looney tune book that said a secret service man stood up in one of the limos and shot Kennedy.
I don't know which fantasy is my favorite. The story that there was someone in the sewer or the poster[who will remain anonymous] who said that there were TWO shooters in the window.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson