319 posted on 11/28/01 10:53 AM Pacific by BeAChooser
First of all, you've absolutely stumped me, or your vocabulary is so far above mine, well I just can't compete.
Next, Howlin has been vetted on FR long ago; I have no reason to *not* be friendly with her; you have no idea what her beliefs are; you, OTOH, are a fly-by-night, one-trick pony.
Next, it is none of your business what I believe about Brown's death, and I have no intention of discussing with you.
Pin me down? You can't pin on, or down, your own diaper. Pin me down? Nah, I RUN too fast, remember? LOL
Sure I do.
She SAID she doesn't believe Brown was murdered (but won't tell us the reason why other than to ... recently ... allude to the official report ... a report which DEMONSTRABLY LIES about the facts in the case). She has also suggested in numerous previous discussions the other views I noted. A good question is why you keep popping up on threads to defend her ... and guy737sw and several others who have demonstrated a willingness to run from or be dishonest about the Ron Brown facts.
Next, it is none of your business what I believe about Brown's death, and I have no intention of discussing with you.
But it is, since you have argued on multiple occasions that we should MOVE ON with regards to the Clinton/DNC crimes. Understanding what you believe about specific instances allows us to better judge your motivations for wanting to give Clinton and his mafia a free pass on this and other transgressions. It is because you have on some occasions (like during our first discussion) implied that you believe he was murdered, but on other occasions (like earlier in this thread) implied that he was not murdered. Which is it? You seem to pick whichever view is convenient at the moment ... how very Clintonesc.
Pin me down? You can't pin on, or down, your own diaper.
Why don't you argue the merits of the Brown facts, katze?