You do.
You continue to argue with me, telling me I am wrong. That is YOUR problem. You are obsessed with it.
And don't bother to post back to me, asking me why I don't believe he was murdered. I have a right to believe what I believe, just as you have a right to continue your obsession.
Lame. Lame.
If you've read the information then you should be able to explain away those FACTS I asked you about. Why do you BELIEVE a government report that contains demonstrable LIES? (that's a democRAT characteristic, you know)
For example, what does the report say about the presence of bone in in the wound? Gormley (having read ALL the information on the case, you of course know who he is) stated several times that one of the reasons he ruled it a blunt force trauma is that he saw bone in the wound. But when challenged YEARS LATER with the head x-ray (which was available during the examination) and photo of the wound (which he saw firsthand) ... he quickly retracted that statement and said he was "mistaken". Others present at the examination are also on record saying that there was no bone visible in the wound ... saying that they said so DURING the examination when they were calling for the autopsy that Gormley denied. So what does the report say about these FACTS, Howlin? Prove to us its not a coverup.
And don't bother to post back to me, asking me why I don't believe he was murdered. I have a right to believe what I believe, just as you have a right to continue your obsession.
You'd like me to go away but I won't. Here again, you act JUST LIKE A DEMOCRAT stating that it is your RIGHT to BELIEVE what you WANT to believe ... regardless of the FACTS. JUST LIKE A DEMOCRAT. EYES WIDE SHUT.