EXCELLENT NEWS-LARRY KLAYMAN JUST SAID THAT THE LORAL SHAREHOLDERS CASE - *** HAS BEEN REFILED ***

Judicial Watch ^ | 11/24/01 | Larry Klayman

[Howlin]

I notice that you didn't address my statement that you seem to believe we must go to court BEFORE beginning an investigation.

The reason I didn't address it is because I never said anything like that; you are the one that wants a new investigation, right?

Aren't you the one that wants to exhume Ron Brown's HEAD???????

Larry has been investigating. Why hasn't HE or even YOU come up with the evidence to go to a court with? You seem to have all the so called "facts;" I suggest YOU go to court and prove your theory.

[Howlin]

I know you haven't had many takers

We seem to be the last of a LONG line of straight men for him. But if we stopped, who would BeAChooser rant at?

[Mudboy Slim]

De nada, mi amiga...MUD

[Mudboy Slim]

"Bin Laden's PEE PEE"

ROFL...or Der SchleekMeister's, whatever the case may be.

FReegards...MUD

[notyourregularhandle]

I'm glad you liked it...I was called a spammer by "countercounterculture" and the admin monitor guy...oh well i'll get over it.. ;)

[Mudboy Slim]

Thank you, my FRiend...and I do sincerely believe that Dubyuh will Do the Right Thing when it comes time to hold Clinton responsible for his crimes!! And Dubyuh's Daddy will not stand in his way!!

FReegards...MUD

[OPS4]

Larry Klayman is a hero and bringing in his mothers laundery from the left, reminds me of an old saying. If you cannot win with truth, then dazzle them with B.S., Nice try. OPS4

[BeAChooser]

Let me tell you this one more time: you can put a dead body into EVIDENCE in a trial;

So why did you object so vehemently to me calling the incriminating items that I listed in the Brown case "EVIDENCE"? Those items COULD be "put into EVIDENCE in a trial" couldn't they? Sure, they might then be cross examined and found not to be fact but they would still have been put into evidence ... RIGHT? Shall I pull up the definitions of evidence that both of us cited and see who is disassembling now? I told you all along that the material PRESENTED in the courtroom is evidence and you disagreed, maintaining that it also had to be proven TRUE before it was evidence. You stated, for example, that It's NOT evidence until it gets into a courtroom and is cross examined. That IS quite different than the definition you are now trying to put forth, which by the way IS more in line with the dictionary definitions that BOTH of us cited, way back when.

And why don't you comment on your apparent belief that someone (Klayman?) must go to court BEFORE Ashcroft can begin an investigation into the Brown matter and GATHER the material that will be put into evidence? Is that what you think?

[Howlin]

You just don't want to hear it, do you? It's NOT the truth and fact until it's tried and proven in court so it's NOT evidence.

[BeAChooser]

He's done that on his own by 1) Suing his own mother;

And I AGAIN challenge you to cite and quote an article that gives the details of this lawsuit. You want to use it to impune Klayman's character when the facts seem to suggest that his reasons for filing the suit were entirely noble. Quit trying to impune his character without using FACTS.

2) Attacking our honorable president and his family;

What? For suggesting that they might be MOVING ON in the case of credible evidence of MURDER, TREASON and other serious crimes. Tell me, would YOU remain silent if YOU knew that were going on? Perhaps.

and 3) Having you and Miss Print as his defenders, enablers and shills.

I'm nobody's shill. I've stated over and over that I have no objection to people going after Klayman for some of his RECENT activities, especially where the facts don't seem to support the action. He IS acting like an ambulance chaser. Nor do I suggest giving JW money right now. So why call me a shill?

But, you, on the other hand, DO act like a democRAT shill. You advocate MOVIN-ON ... just like democRATS would be expected to do. You argue like a democRAT bringing nothing but adhominen attacks to the table. You RUN from the facts ... in the Brown case and other matters ... just like democRATS who tend to flee when faced with facts they can't deal with that threaten their world view or their party.

Now if you want to tell us why you LIED about the Brown case, calling an examination that clearly was not an autopsy an autopsy and suggesting that he had no motive for turning state's evidence ... in a blatent attempt to keep the less informed from looking closer at the case ... then go ahead. The whole ISSUE is that there should have been an autopsy and there wasn't one. The whole ISSUE is that there seems to be EVIDENCE which suggests a motive for killing him. Why aren't you interested? Well in any case, Bush and Ashcroft, if they are as honest as you say (and I certainly hope they are), can STILL order an autopsy. THEN we would know who is right ... the "move-on" club or people like me.

[Mudboy Slim]

"I was called a spammer by "countercounterculture" and the admin monitor guy..."

LOL...reckon humor's in the eye of the beholder. That's the only time I've seen that one.

FReegards...MUD

[OPS4]

Where there is smoke there is fire, wake up and realize Clinton and his boys are liars and cheats who committed treason. OPS4 145 Cox: "Chinagate will have to wait" 140 Sandy Berger sued over Chinagate 86 JOHN HUANG ASSERTS FIFTH AMENDMENT ON MANY ISSUES 542 Judicial Watch Lawsuit Against Loral/Clinton Administration May Be Only Hope for Justice 205 CORRUPTION LARGELY UNADDRESSED BY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES 162 CLINTON AVOIDS PANAMA CANAL HANDOVER CEREMONIES - A GUILTY CONSCIENCE AT WORK? 292 WE TOLD YOU SO! 578 JUDICIAL WATCH TO REFILE CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS IN LORAL/CHINAGATE LAWSUIT 46 HILLARY CLINTON IS DEFENDANT IN TWO JUDICIAL WATCH LAWSUITS 59 CHINAGATE IS BACK 155 CHINAGATE BONANZA ON FOX NEWS TONIGHT! 1164 The Edge with Paula Zahn: Dick Morris, Peter Fenn and John Fund Criticize 60 Gore Deeply Involved in Chinagate 305 Election Returns Show Political And Media Establishment Can't Ignore Political Corruption 396 TOM DELAY "COPY-CAT" CASE NOT THE REAL THING 388 RENO COVERS-UP AGAIN 397 JUDICIAL WATCH RICO CASE CONCERNING LORAL, THE CLINTONS, GORE, AND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT THAN CASE AGAINST TOM DELAY 88 JUDICIAL WATCH TO DEPOSE EX-COMMERCE OFFICIAL JUDE KEARNEY IN CHINAGATE CASE ON APRIL 20, 1999 193 JUDICIAL WATCH SERVES DEMAND LETTER ON GERMAN AND U.S. BANKS FINANCING THE CLINTONS' MANSION 360 CHARLIE TRIE RECOMMENDED FOR CONTEMPT IN JUDICIAL WATCH CASE 89 FORMER TOP COMMERCE LAWYER FORCED TO ADMIT SELLING SEATS ON COMMERCE TRADE MISSIONS WOULD BE ILLEGAL 399 LOUISIANA GOVERNOR EDWIN EDWARDS CONVICTED OF RACKETEERING FOR TAKING POLITICAL BRIBES 103 GORE HIRES INFLUENCE PEDDLER 213 CLINTON JUSTICE DEPARTMENT INDICTS MCDONNELL DOUGLAS FOR ALLEGED CHINAGATE EXPORT VIOLATIONS BUT FAILS TO INDICT LORAL AND SCHWARTZ

[Howlin]

ALL CAPS is considered rude, in case nobody has told you yet.

[VA Advogado]

Aren't you the one that wants to exhume Ron Brown's HEAD???????

BAC refuses to acknowlege there have been pictures taken of the inside of Ron Brown's noggin. I pointed BAC to a very credible link and he still won't let go of the Brown thing. Brown was at the top of the world when he was suppose to have gone south on Clinton. Where BAC gets this from I will never know. Miss Print is playing Moe to Beachooser's Curly. Chase = Larry?

[Howlin]

I'm sure the family will be delighted to hear he ONLY wants the head exhumed.

[OPS4]

Rude? according to who? Political correctness? That went out with the Clintonite garbage. Ops4

[LoneGreenEyeshade]

I'LL KEEP YOU POSTED---AS SOON AS I CAN.

lol,LGE

[Howlin]

Typing in all CAPS is considered yelling on the internet. According to everybody.

[katze]

#352 Fewer than you and me. ;-)

[katze]

#351 Good graphic, funny caption.