Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheOtherOne
versus a private transaction? I think the act of purchase between two private parties does not make it public, nor of reasonable suspiction to warrant a search.

This law does not govern transactions between private parties. It covers cash purchases in the amount of $10,000 from a retailer. As you well know, such transactions are covered by the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution and reasonable limitations on interstate commerce have been upheld by the Courts.

171 posted on 11/24/2001 5:22:51 AM PST by JD86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: JD86
This law does not govern transactions between private parties. It covers cash purchases in the amount of $10,000 from a retailer. As you well know, such transactions are covered by the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution and reasonable limitations on interstate commerce have been upheld by the Courts.

What if I buy from a local store? All I said was that this Act, as applied in some cases, is a violation of the 4th Amendment. Is it in all cases, no. Will it ever effect me, no. Is that a reason to allow the Government to write sloppy laws that do not follow the Constitutional prohibitions? I don't think so.

183 posted on 11/24/2001 6:40:23 AM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson