Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Miss Marple
Since the preliminary tests from her home and post office have turned up negative(so far) she would have to inhaled it when she was out. The only problem is if she was exposed when she was out of her home wouldn't she have had any on her clothing or shoes that she would have brought back in her house(even small amounts) that would have shown up on the testing from her home? This case gets stranger and stranger...
16 posted on 11/23/2001 6:59:21 PM PST by teresat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: teresat
That's the real question. How does someone inhale anthrax without a sample getting on the clothing? The KGB has pointed out that it's easy to commit a murder, but much harder to commit a natural death. (Perhaps the KGB was trying to find out how to infect someone with the invariable fatal, natural causes.)
19 posted on 11/23/2001 7:12:50 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: teresat
Good point. One of the mysteries about the death of the lady from NYC is that they did not find any anthrax on her clothing either. There has to be a method of delivery that is occuring that goes directly into someone and misses 'spillage' on clothing and surrounding areas. Hmmm?
29 posted on 11/23/2001 8:07:43 PM PST by zeaal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson