Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PILGRIM OR PURITAN
Pilgrim Or Puritan (There Is A Difference) ^

Posted on 11/22/2001 4:51:53 AM PST by PJ-Comix

The terms "Pilgrim and Puritan" may be used sometimes interchangeably in
some printed sources, but this is incorrect.  English Separatists,
including Pilgrims and Puritans, were those people in England, who, during the reign
of Queen Mary, refused to conform to the public services of the Roman
Catholic Church.

Separatists worshipped in defiance of the established Anglican Church of
England.  By the close of the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, there were three
kinds of Separatists:

1. Those who believed in the established church having connection with the
state were wrong and unscriptural.  The local church should manage its own
affairs.  These were the Pilgrims.
2. Those who would have a state church under Presbyterian form of
government.
3. Those who desired a purified worship but still remained in the Church of
England.  These were the Puritans.

Thirty-five of the Mayflower voyagers who landed in Plymouth in 1620 were
Pilgrims, the other 65 were not separatists, but were sent by the Virginia
Company to work.  New Pilgrims arrived in 1621, Salem became a successful
second town, and by 1640 there were eight towns in the Pilgrim colony in
the New World.

The Puritans were part of a group called the Massachusetts Bay Company who
originally were destined for Salem, Massachusetts, but who settled in
Boston in 1630.  Although religious freedom was an influential cause of Puritan
settlement, economic betterment and land acquisition was on the minds of many new arrivals.

Eventually, the Pilgrims were outnumbered in Salem. In 1691 the King
appointed a new governor who joined Maine and the Plymouth Colony to the
Massachusetts Bay Colony and Salem became a Puritan Town.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Being Thanksgiving, I thought I might post this article to clear up a common confusion of Pilgrim with Puritan. As you can see, there is a difference.
1 posted on 11/22/2001 4:51:53 AM PST by PJ-Comix (pj@pjcomix.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Thank you for posting this.

I am a 1600's American history buff.

One of my pet peeves being cleared up.

2 posted on 11/22/2001 4:59:48 AM PST by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
As you can see, there is a difference.

Not to John Wayne.:^))

HAPPY THANKSGIVING, PILGRIM

3 posted on 11/22/2001 5:00:05 AM PST by janus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
It also emphasizes the fallacy of the "religious tolerance" argument. While the Separatists may have left England for religious reasons, economic development was at the root of colonial expansion. This has always been a capitalist enterprise, and one in which a certain degree of religious freedom was accepted, but certainly not universal religious sufferage.
4 posted on 11/22/2001 5:13:55 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Thanks. I din't know that stuff...
5 posted on 11/22/2001 5:14:22 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
3. Those who desired a purified worship but still remained in the Church of England. These were the Puritans.

Do you have more information on exactly what the Puritans were seeking to purify in the worship? Thanks.

6 posted on 11/22/2001 5:21:36 AM PST by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Also of interest are the differences between the Cavaliers who settled in Virginia and the Puritans of New England. Louis L'Amour wrote a book once based on this theme where a Virginia colonist wanders up to New England early in the 17th century.
7 posted on 11/22/2001 5:23:19 AM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Thanks for the clarification.
8 posted on 11/22/2001 5:26:26 AM PST by nonliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Thanks for the post. What group did Stephen Hopkins fall into?
9 posted on 11/22/2001 5:27:45 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
What group did Stephen Hopkins fall into?

Well, he definitely wasn't a Puritan since he was once charged with selling illegal intoxicants.

10 posted on 11/22/2001 5:37:00 AM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
A Thanksgiving bump!
11 posted on 11/22/2001 5:41:16 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Big Laugh! We know that he worked for the Virginia Company and had been to America before the Mayflower trip!

What book are you getting this data from? Thanks!

12 posted on 11/22/2001 6:06:32 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: PJ-Comix
I love Louis L'Amour's books, but I've not read that one. I'll have to find it.

I stumbled across his grave a few years ago. He's buried at Forest Lawn in Glendale, up near the chapel where the Last Supper window is. His grave is on the edge of a little hill, facing West, of course.

14 posted on 11/22/2001 7:30:23 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson