Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oceanperch
I believe that she doesn't realize, because it hasn't penetrated her ego, that she has benefited from a pernicious trend in the Hollywood milieu - "defining prettiness down." I mean, you could go to the student union at the University of Texas, close your eyes, spin around a couple of times, stick out your arm and open your eyes, and more than likely, if you were pointing at a female, she'd be better looking than Roberts. It's a result IMO of female movie ticket buyers not wanting to see gal stars who are better looking than them. Now, Kelly LeBrock - she was a pretty woman. There's others like her, I'm sure.
183 posted on 11/24/2001 10:59:07 PM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: 185JHP
agree
184 posted on 11/25/2001 12:07:44 AM PST by oceanperch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: 185JHP
I believe that she doesn't realize, because it hasn't penetrated her ego, that she has benefited from a pernicious trend in the Hollywood milieu - "defining prettiness down."

That has to be it because her looks just does not cut the Hollywood PR around her. Any of the so-called super models blow her away in the looks category. And Roberts has a coarseness about her that detracts even more from what little beauty she has. Perhaps as America has become a more coarse crude culture Roberts perfectly reflects this trend. A lady she is not.

189 posted on 11/25/2001 8:27:14 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson