Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Landru; Mudboy Slim; Snow Bunny; KLT; Ragtime Cowgirl; goldilucky; All
(let me kindly/astutely - add one more pertinent detail)

Good friend Landru, remember about six weeks ago, I posted that Mr Mud had informed me (and he has never denied this) -
- that Mr Mud "likes to play, good cop/bad cop" - - - - well, let me ask you (and state publicly)....
...what does this tell us/what do cops do - they draw criminal conclusions!!!

"..THEY DRAW CRIMINAL CONCLUSIONS!!" - (huh Mr Mud with your "figment of imagination" line!!) - - -Thank you.

71 posted on 11/27/2001 8:00:24 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: ChaseR
Yer being a PUNK again, dude...hope you grow out of it, but in the meantime, leave me out of it.

Capiche?!

MUD

78 posted on 11/27/2001 8:25:59 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: ChaseR
"...what does this tell us/what do cops do - they draw criminal conclusions!!!"

I functioned as an Investigator for a while in the military, ChaseR.
Please; do not comment on matters you know not what you're talking about. Alright?

*Any* conclusion(s) drawn by those working in law enforcement are based upon their observations & the physical evidence' with circumstancial eveidence the exception to the rule.

Having said that, &, whether or not you elect to accept my POV?
Please do NOT send any *evidence* of your assertions and/or allegations against the poster in question to me privately.
I will not read it.

What I will expect you to do then, is post this *evidence* right here publically on this forum for the ACCUSED to see for herself, first.
*That's* how things are done in the United States of America, ChaseR!
We nearly lost that right with the last adminstration; moreover, it's that right which has been infringed upon [somewhat] with the new warpowers *Patriot Act* just passed...which has so very many here all worked into quite a lather?

But also when you post this *evidence* publically?
You afford all who care, a chance to view, consider, & then make a decision for themselves.
Decisions such as, whose full of shit, whose being less than honest, & who is or isn't downright delusional.

I'm very sorry to tell you I'll not permit you to involve me in a *part* of your conspiracy if it be an unjust one; but, do not despair...I'd never permit anyone to do likewise with me against you, either.

IF after all have deliberated on this matter within their heart & head it is decided, based upon fact, that you're in-fact correct?
I'd be amoung the first to so-state the error of my ways for all; & immediately issue you a public apology.

You see?
'Round here when people behave in ways that're deemed less than honorable?
It's customary that individual be shunned; but, you haven't done that a'tall with this person & I for one am compelled to wonder why?
It's as if you're afraid for us with all the behaviors of a jealous old man who has a beautiful trophy-wife.
This old man won't trust her word to be faithful but never gives her the chance to prove her faithfullness, either.
As such the old man ceases to be a husband, & becomes her jailer.

This whole episode's wellllllll below you; & I want you to know that's how I see this.

84 posted on 11/27/2001 9:06:38 AM PST by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson