What shockingly biased commentary on this even. Reuters, to show its neutrality, should avoid loaded terms like “cruel, senseless, a terrible waste” or comment that “their deaths also make us angry, outraged at what appears to be yet more cold-blooded executions.”
A truly objective reporter would have termed this “activity” what it is: that several persons employed by news organizations met with an unknown group of people on a road in Afghanistan and, after a disagreement, died due to unknown causes not believed to be natural.
oops. even=event.
that several persons employed by news organizations met with an unknown group of people on a road in Afghanistan and, after a disagreement, died due to unknown causes not believed to be natural.Yikes, that was scary. Please keep a lid on it, lest Reuters comes, and chloroforms you, then carries you off to Afghanistan as their new star reporter...