To: Restorer
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; Congress did not declare war. However, their authorization can be seen constitutionally. They have authorized a reprisal. Since a reprisal constitutes authorizing a military response to a specific situation, then within the confines of that authorization, Bush has war powers.
3 posted on
11/19/2001 8:55:25 PM PST by
xzins
To: xzins
Congress' almost-unanimous resolution essentially authorizes Bush to wage war on whomever he chooses. I'm not sure this is a good precedent. I doubt Bush will misue it, but imagine the money BC could have shaken loose by threatening potential targets!
4 posted on
11/19/2001 8:59:59 PM PST by
Restorer
To: xzins
Congress did not declare war. However, their authorization can be seen constitutionally. They have authorized a reprisal. Since a reprisal constitutes authorizing a military response to a specific situation, then within the confines of that authorization, Bush has war powers. Do you even know what a letter of Marque and Reprisal is?!
Congres has not authorized any marque and reprisal. Are you out of your mind?
Indeed, Congress is prohibited from doing so by treaties entered into during the Hague Conference.
Do you always make crap up and post it to the internet? Or, is it only when you are defending tyrants for whom you voted?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson