Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
I wonder if Dana Milbank expressed such concerns about Clinton's abuse of Executive Orders. Somehow I doubt it.

Why would that make a difference?

Does Dana Milbank's hypocrisy excuse your hypocrisy?

Freepers called for impeachment (rightfully so) over Clinton's perjury. What if Clinton had signed this EO? What would you have said then?

19 posted on 11/20/2001 8:22:53 AM PST by BabylonXXX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: BabylonXXX
Why would that make a difference?

It makes a lot of difference, bucko, in determining the validity of a journalist's criticisms.

Does Dana Milbank's hypocrisy excuse your hypocrisy?

Once again, knock off the abusive posts.

Freepers called for impeachment (rightfully so) over Clinton's perjury. What if Clinton had signed this EO? What would you have said then?

I would have examined the circumstances - we were never at war during the Clinton Administration, so it's a moot point. But there is historical precedent for these actions, and this is a serious national emergency. The important step is to confine these actions to actual foreign terrorists. If these actions are expanded, then I will oppose them.

21 posted on 11/20/2001 8:28:36 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson