To: xzins
Bush could easily argue that he'd been constitutionally authorized to retaliate (reprisal) to a specific situation using military force. No need to argue anything. The constitution only requires that congress approve military action in a time of war. The constitution is silent on how that declaration must be written. The Joint Resolution was and is all this president requires to fully exercise his powers as a war time CIC. Every thing he has done to date in this operation is as the Commander In Chief of the armed forces NOT, as president.
To: Texasforever
If 5,000 Americans dead, is not a time to declare war, when is a time to declare war?
To: Texasforever
Every thing he has done to date in this operation is as the Commander In Chief of the armed forces NOT, as president.You are so right and this is a point totally missed by the MSM and their general masses of public listers and readers.
27 posted on
01/21/2006 11:10:13 AM PST by
p23185
(Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson