Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
Bush could easily argue that he'd been constitutionally authorized to retaliate (reprisal) to a specific situation using military force.

No need to argue anything. The constitution only requires that congress approve military action in a time of war. The constitution is silent on how that declaration must be written. The Joint Resolution was and is all this president requires to fully exercise his powers as a war time CIC. Every thing he has done to date in this operation is as the Commander In Chief of the armed forces NOT, as president.

12 posted on 11/19/2001 9:31:22 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Texasforever
If 5,000 Americans dead, is not a time to declare war, when is a time to declare war?
14 posted on 11/20/2001 4:51:29 AM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Texasforever
Every thing he has done to date in this operation is as the Commander In Chief of the armed forces NOT, as president.

You are so right and this is a point totally missed by the MSM and their general masses of public listers and readers.

27 posted on 01/21/2006 11:10:13 AM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson