[xzins]

See #10 for response. Also, would you agree that the meaning of "make no law regarding an establishment of religion" has changed considerably IN INTERPRETATION since the writing of the constitution. Given that, I'm sure Bush lawyers can be quite facile in "updating" the INTERPRETATION of "reprisal."

From a constitutional dictionary: Reprisal Archaic. An act taken by a nation, short of war, to gain redress for an action taken against that nation. For example, seizing a ship in retaliation for a seized ship.

Not necessarily limited to ship-for-ship retaliation.

[BabylonXXX]

See #10 for response. Also, would you agree that the meaning of "make no law regarding an establishment of religion" has changed considerably IN INTERPRETATION since the writing of the constitution. Given that, I'm sure Bush lawyers can be quite facile in "updating" the INTERPRETATION of "reprisal."

With all due respect, you are an ignoramus.

You have no idea what you are talking about. None. Your ignorance exceeds all comprehension. The Constitution was written, in part, to keep people like you from ever obtaining any position of authority. In light of the fact that you are oblivious to the 200+ year history of the concept of LIBERTY and FREEDOM, it is not surprising that you know nothing of the 500+ year history of the term "Marque and Reprisal". Quit trying to be an armchair attorney. It's painful to watch.