Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius6961
Sorry sparky, not at all. It isn't mob rule if the majority that elected the leaders are the same majority who don't want the porn within eyeshot of their kids.
87 posted on 11/19/2001 11:19:15 PM PST by Demosthenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Demosthenes
Actually it is. If a majority(or sometimes not even that, but a plurality) elects some dolt who decides along with the other handful of morons/tyrants to enact some law, then it isn't any more moral or constitutional.

As for people talking about exactly what was on the books in the late 1700s, and quoting decisions, it's not relevant to the true issue. Do we REALLY want to go back to that time? Let's see, I'd be the son of a slave, therefore a slave, or at best an oppressed minority. Hey, instead of being infinitely more moral and intelligent than you, I could be a stableboy.

This is the same country that had the Dred Scott decision, right? lol

Thanks, but the Founders and the Constitution are just helpful guides, but I wouldn't suggest we follow them as absolute moral/political exemplars.

91 posted on 11/20/2001 12:05:35 AM PST by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson