Replies

Stop taking comments out of context if you wish to continue this! "Einstein"? I just let you know your idea of morality and mine may/may not differ. "Verbal threats"? You know where I stand, care to step outside? Hard to converse with a mental giant like yourself.
Anyway you still didn't answer my question. Where do you draw the line on pornography since you don't have a problem with it?You answered your own question slick. If I don't have a problem with it? It doesn't bother me that these businesses exist, why should it concern you so greatly. What is their existence doing to hamper your life? You don't like it, so that's enough. I don't have a problem with Gun Stores, I don't have a problem with Bars. Hell, we even have a local Tobacco Shop, that most evil of weeds. They are "Legitimate Businesses" doing legitimate business. If you have a problem with these kinds of businesses, the cure is to make it illegal. I'm sure if you thought you could do that you would. An approach to do so would probably enlighten you a bit as to how much you are in a minority opinion, or it would have been done long before you came onto the scene. I did have a problem with dallydo's taking the place of the Flag in some dirtwater town USA this past week. I find it rather Vouyeristic for you even to want that kind of information from me to begin with. Your snide reference to NAMBLA, like that was the issue, is what got me riled up. NAMBLA=PORN, PORN=NAMBLA? Is this the point you were trying to make here? Simply put, attempts to shut down a legitimate business by fining them into bankruptcy, is pretty un-American, even for those so pure amongst us. Not all of us are scared to look at naked women. Sorry if that offends you, NOT! Blackbird.

Stop taking things out of context? Maybe you should go back and read all the posts. Did I say I agree with fining them out of business? Or banning? I just don't think they belong in residential neighborhoods. Your the one that threw the hissy fit. Your the one threatening me over my opinion. So I guess you have a problem with the 1st Amendment then since you like to threaten people over their opinion. Real intelligent, what is this high school? It seems like you love to take things out of context yourself since your accusing me of something I never said. You were the one who stated the thing about "wants and needs" taking precedent over others. My point is that just because someone has "wants and needs" that doesn't justify that they have a legal right to it. Get it? That was my point with NAMBLA that you didn't get. If they say that their "wants and needs" consist of child porn well does that make child porn OK? This is basically their argument. Maybe you should read up on the political motives of these people since you have a similar argument. So your saying that "porn" is simply a naked woman? Wow you must have some real wholesome porn shops in West Virginia. That's your definition of porn? Give me a freaking break!!!! You don't need a porn shop to get a picture of a naked woman you can get that at any convenience store. Porn is not victimless.