Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chad Fairbanks
I beg to differ that it has to be outdoors or in full public view in order to be regulated.

For instance, many communities and states have anti-gambling rules, because the voters know that gambling "businesses" change the fabric of a community. Most gambling, last I saw, didn't take place on sidewalks or in full public view.

And there, again, a little gambling over a poker game in one's living room is not the same thing.

175 posted on 11/20/2001 7:27:03 AM PST by joathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]


To: joathome
And yet, my community has decided to allow casinos, only a few short blocks from my home, which pisses me off to no end - The easiest way for me to deal with it (no pun intended) is to avoid it. I don't go there and I don't patronize it, but apparently many people in my community do, so it's not my place to force my anti-gambling morality on the rest of my community. People have a choice - to go there or not - I choose not. Pretty simple.
182 posted on 11/20/2001 7:31:25 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

To: joathome
And there, again, a little gambling over a poker game in one's living room is not the same thing.

And a little law violation is OK as long as you hide it from the nosey? Most gambling laws I know of cover all gambling including the "friendly" home game. Do you condone doing anything you want as long as you don't get caught? Sounds like it from your post.

187 posted on 11/20/2001 7:39:47 AM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson