Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rodney King
You can go to http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/get-cfr.cgi?TITLE=14&PART=108&SECTION=9&YEAR=2001&TYPE=TEXT for CFR Title 14 Part 108 Section 9, "Screening of passengers and property," to see that everyone must be screened.
Also see my post #114 for Part 107 Section 20:
No person may enter a sterile area without submitting to the screening of his or her person and property in accordance with the procedures being applied to control access to that area under Sec. 108.9 or Sec. 129.25 of this chapter.
I think it's common sense that everyone must submit to security to enter the secure area of an airport.
164 posted on 11/19/2001 5:49:13 PM PST by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: heleny
Thank you. You knew. SBECK did not. By the way, that is still not relavent. We all know that eveyrone must be screened. The question was, did the airport over-react. The was SBECK was bluffing, I assumed that there was a section that said "if someone gets by, the airport must be closed down".

Of course everyone must be screened. Who said that they didn't? The issue is, what is the response when someone gets by? SBECK question the intelligence of everyone who did not know which section oc CFR 14 107 FAR 108 addressed this, but he does not know either.

167 posted on 11/19/2001 5:52:35 PM PST by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson