Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
I accept their ruling in 69 as valid, because I can do little else. My point is the REASON behind the ruling. In all the other rulings, the SCOTUS found lincoln at fault. Yes? If the same court found his actions DURING the war at fault, logically one could assume that over time they would find that his actions in starting the war would be at fault. However, to do that, detractors of the court would start pointing fingers at others within the administration for possible criminal charges. Namely, one Chief Justice Chase.
293 posted on 11/21/2001 4:59:31 AM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]


To: billbears
I don't agree that there is a logical conclusion between one and the other, especially since Lincoln was faced with a rebellion he did not start.
295 posted on 11/21/2001 5:16:07 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies ]

To: billbears
In all the other rulings, the SCOTUS found lincoln at fault.

What crime was Lincoln charged with?

Walt

299 posted on 11/21/2001 5:58:09 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson