Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arab World Poverty -- Whose Fault?
Capitalism Magazine ^ | 11/18/01 | Larry Elder

Posted on 11/18/2001 1:04:52 PM PST by Jean S


"Muslims love to live in the U.S. but also love to hate it. Many openly claim that the U.S. is a terrorist state but they continue to live in it. Their decision to live here is testimony that they would rather live here than anywhere else. As an Indian Muslim, I know for sure that nowhere on earth, including India, will I get the same sense of dignity and respect that I have received in the U.S."

Arab World Poverty -- Whose Fault?
By Larry Elder
(November 18, 2001)

[CAPITALISMMAGAZINE.COM] "I don't have the knowledge to blame a government," said Bakhtiar Khan, an Afghan man in his mid-twenties. "I don't know about politics, but for our problems I blame the world community. All humans should be equal, but we are not. You ask me who is to blame. You find out who is to blame."

Khan, according to a recent New York Times piece on the origins of Islamic extremism, earns a subsistence level income making bricks in a pit outside the city of Peshawar, an Afghan city of 2 million, nearly 50 percent refugees. When asked about his life, he says, "Life is cruel. You can see for yourself. You wear nice clothes and are healthy. But look at us. We have no clothes to wear and we are not healthy. Your question is amazing."

So, who is to blame?

A recent story on Afghan schools described a teacher who holds up a wealth pie chart. America, she shows her students, controls this huge slice of the pie, leaving a tiny sliver for us Afghans. The not-so-subtle point? Afghans suffer poverty because of America's disproportionate wealth.

But no, Khan lacks the "knowledge to blame a government." For, through knowledge, Khan would discover that his poverty stems from corrupt, dictatorial governments, the absence of capitalism and free trade, and the lack of individual rights and the rule of law. But who, in the Arab world, spreads this message?

Dr. Muqtedar Khan, director of International Studies at Adrian College in Michigan, challenges American Muslims to set the masses straight: "While we loudly and consistently condemn Israel for its ill treatment of Palestinians, we are silent when Muslim regimes abuse the rights of Muslims and slaughter thousands of them. Remember Saddam and his use of chemical weapons against Muslims (Kurds)? Remember Pakistani army's excesses against Muslims (Bengalis)? Remember the Mujahideen of Afghanistan and their mutual slaughter? Have we ever condemned them for their excesses? Have we demanded international intervention or retribution against them? Do you know how the Saudis treat their minority Shiis? Have we protested the violation of their rights? But we all are eager to condemn Israel; not because we care for rights and lives of the Palestinians, we don't. We condemn Israel because we hate 'them.'

"Muslims love to live in the U.S. but also love to hate it. Many openly claim that the U.S. is a terrorist state but they continue to live in it. Their decision to live here is testimony that they would rather live here than anywhere else. As an Indian Muslim, I know for sure that nowhere on earth, including India, will I get the same sense of dignity and respect that I have received in the U.S. No Muslim country will treat me as well as the U.S. has. If what happened on Sept. 11 had happened in India, the biggest democracy, thousands of Muslims would have been slaughtered in riots on mere suspicion and there would be another slaughter after confirmation. But in the U.S., bigotry and xenophobia has been kept in check by media and leaders ...

"It is time that we acknowledge that the freedoms we enjoy in the U.S. are more desirable to us than superficial solidarity with the Muslim World. If you disagree, then prove it by packing your bags and going to whichever Muslim country you identify with. If you do not leave and do not acknowledge that you would rather live here than anywhere else, know that you are being hypocritical.

"It is time that we faced these hypocritical practices and struggled to transcend them. It is time that American Muslim leaders fought to purify their own lot."

But only a few weeks ago, Arab leaders condemned Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi for calling Western civilization "superior" because it "guarantees respect for human rights and religion." Harsh criticism forced him to recant his "racist" statement. But if we call Berlusconi's remarks "racist," in what category do we place the statement made by Abdulrahman Awadi, formerly a high-ranking official in Kuwait? When Kuwait learned that Sulaiman abu Ghaith, a Kuwaiti citizen, had become a top lieutenant with Osama bin Laden, Kuwait revoked abu Ghaith's citizenship. Awadi said, "This is a wake-up call that we have to be very careful with freedom. Democracy and freedom of choice may be good for Western cultures, but for the Gulf countries, those are dangerous things. These people are using freedom to achieve their ends."

Who is to blame?

Countries like Saudi Arabia and Egypt suffer double-digit unemployment rates, estimated as high as 25 percent. Grinding poverty and religious zealotry, wrapped around a blanket of government-led scapegoating of Israel, the United States and the West -- all combine to form a dangerous and deadly Third World victicrat mindset. Blame triumphs over enlightenment, and anger defeats reason.

CREATORS SYNDICATE COPYRIGHT 2001 LAURENCE A. ELDER

 



TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: clashofcivilizatio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-318 next last
To: Bobby777
bump
141 posted on 12/24/2001 7:42:40 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Arabs actually believe if the US was a poor backward country like Islamic countries are, they would be better off. They're insane. 137 posted on 12/24/01 10:43 AM Pacific by FITZ

NO, they are retarted!!

142 posted on 12/24/2001 7:44:06 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: timestax
They don't like to work, they just want to "people watch" at the local markets. Perhaps viewing and commenting on the womens' burkas!!Woooohoooo, look at the shape of that burka, she must be a hottee!!

OH Abdhul, that's my Grandmother you are talking about!

143 posted on 12/24/2001 8:02:34 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: nobdysfool
This share-the-wealth crap is destructive and wrong.
There are things that should be shared other than the shirt on your back. Some things, like this earth, the air, we have no choice and must share. In order to make this a better world, we should share our love and friendship. You, however, seem very hateful. Don't dispair. We'll get through this together. There's nothing we can't do if we work together.
144 posted on 12/24/2001 8:04:03 PM PST by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Truthfairy
Bump against Islamic pie charts!!!
145 posted on 12/24/2001 10:11:55 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
It's their own fault. Arabs are useless violent people.
146 posted on 12/24/2001 10:21:53 PM PST by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott
It's their own fault. Arabs are useless violent people. 146 posted on 12/24/01 11:22 PM Pacific by boycott [

And arrogant too!!

147 posted on 12/25/2001 4:35:49 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: timestax
What would they do with it?That oil in the ground would be very useless without America and the west.Maybe the sand could be turned into silicon and they could have a vibrant semi conducter business or maybe the most valuable thing alludes them ...freedom.
148 posted on 12/25/2001 6:08:30 AM PST by freeforall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
Perfect. That's why they don't give a sh*t about you either, and since they see your country as an ally of their enemy, they peg you as an enemy.

The Arabs came in and dominated Turkey and imposed their religion on you all. You actually had a better religion before but just because you submitted to the Arabs doesn't mean we ever will.

149 posted on 12/25/2001 7:16:19 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
just because you submitted to the Arabs doesn't mean we ever will.
When did we submit to anyone Fitz?
150 posted on 12/25/2001 8:51:19 AM PST by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: freeforall
What would they do with it?That oil in the ground would be very useless without America and the west.Maybe the sand could be turned into silicon and they could have a vibrant semi conducter business or maybe the most valuable thing alludes them ...freedom. 148 posted on 12/25/01 7:09 AM Pacific by freeforall [ Post Reply

You got That RIGHT!!!!

151 posted on 12/25/2001 11:30:22 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix
bump
152 posted on 12/25/2001 4:11:45 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Who is to blame?

Countries like Saudi Arabia and Egypt suffer double-digit unemployment rates, estimated as high as 25 percent. Grinding poverty and religious zealotry, wrapped around a blanket of government-led scapegoating of Israel, the United States and the West -- all combine to form a dangerous and deadly Third World victicrat mindset. Blame triumphs over enlightenment, and anger defeats reason.

The following article (along with other similar articles) makes it clear what is to blame - islamic law itself. Industrialization requires concentration of capital and rewards for risks. Being able to make large loans at interest (and to contract to compensate future losses) make up the foundation of modern banking and insurance which made the modern corporation and the western industrial revolution possible.

But islamic law does not permit this, and therefore does not permit modern banking -- or modern insurance. Instead, there is the strange creature referred to as the "islamic bank", which is very inefficient, too easy with its convoluted transactions to make crooked (remember BCCI), and cannot support large concentration of capital or reward large concentration of risk. (this is one reason why the saudis do so much investing of money they don't want to kiss off in the west and in the US - they may be crazy but they ain't stupid)

So, in a world where getting out of poverty usually means industrializing, the arab world will always be poor unless they have a cash crop with inelastic demand, like oil or narcotics. Not much point in working hard in a system like this.

From http://www.mg.co.za/mg/news/99sep2/21sep-islam_biz.html

Johannesburg, South Africa. September 21, 1999  

Making money the Muslim way

With a fifth of the world's people following Islamic principles, the debate about the Islamic economic system is hotting up, writes SHAUN HARRIS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The basis of what is today called the Islamic economic system goes back more than 1 400 years and is founded on the values set out in the directives of the prophets, the Qur'an and the Sunna, and the Ijtehad forum.

Yet Islamic economics is very much a developing discipline, particularly in its application to modern life. Growth of Islamic economics and micro-components like the Islamic banking system has been rapid since 1975, the year of the first international Islamic economic conference and the formation of the Islamic Development Bank (IDB). Last month Durban was the venue for the first Islamic economics, banking and finance seminar to be held in Southern Africa.

The three-day meeting brought academics and researchers from around the world to address and debate economic issues with the local Muslim community.

The importance of the seminar, hosted by the Islamic Dawah Movement of Southern Africa and IDB of Saudi Arabia, was to "try to discover and develop a new, fresh approach to economics", says Professor Khurshid Ahmed, vice-president of the Islamic Research Academy in Pakistan.

Ahmed carries a lot of intellectual and moral weight. The Islamic Research Academy is regarded as one of the top Islamic academic institutions in the world, but some of the other positions filled by Ahmed include chair of The Islamic Foundation in the United Kingdom and chair of the Institute of Policy Studies in Pakistan. He was also a member of the Pakistan Senate in 1985.

He set the tone for the meeting by saying that while modern Islamic economics was in the process of transforming itself, its application was important to provide an alternative to some of the problems stemming from Western systems, what he calls "economism" .

"The downfall of economism is that it tries to look at all problems from the economic angle. This tends to reduce humanity to an economic variable," he says. A stern critic of imperialism -- "it led to the impoverishment of the majority and empowerment of the few" -- and capitalism, Ahmed says the aim of Islamic economics is to produce a more fair, just and humane economic system.

"Great strides have been made by professional researchers in the development of Islamic economics and finance over the past 25 years. A number of Western universities all over the world now include courses on Islamic economics.

"But research is not enough -- Islamic economics must now be applied, particularly by the private sector."

This is where the debate really opens up. With a firm basis in religious and ethical principles, the application of Islamic economics to commercial activities like banking, letting and especially insurance is the subject of interpretation, and in some cases pragmatism.

The Islamic principles are clear and accepted by Muslims -- the challenge is how to apply them to modern business, particularly in a non-Islamic country.

Ahmed accepts this cannot happen overnight. "Islamic economics has made great progress, but it is still developing, and still has a long way to go," he says. But what is this developing system of economics? It incorporates, or accepts, some of the features of the modern free-market system, but within the constraints of Shari'ah, rules derived directly from the Qur'an and Sunnah, says Dr Abdel Rahman Yousri, professor of economics at Alexandria University, Egypt.

The base of the Islamic economic system, he says, is composed of the "constants" of Shari'ah but also the variables deducted from them through the Ijtehad forum, described as diligence on the part of Muslim jurists and scholars to find out rules for new issues and problems which face Muslim individuals and societies.

"Thus the Islamic economic system, though established on dogmas, will always possess sufficient flexibility in the face of new issues and problems which inevitably arise in our continuously changing world," Yousri says.   

Central in the "constants" is the complete prohibition of Riba, loosely translated as interest, but with far wider implications, including usury and payments in certain cases on the future expectation of profits or goods.

The owners of capital are instead allowed and encouraged to invest, through various methods, in profit-and loss-sharing ventures.

A common misconception about Islamic economics is that it precludes a return on capital. It does not, as long as the original capital is invested in assets or an enterprise that can produce a profit -- ultimately a return on capital.

What is strictly not allowed is for money to generate its own return directly, as in the interest charged on loans by Western banks.

This has allowed for the formation and rapid development of Islamic banking. Dr Osman Babikr, a researcher with the IDB, says according to Islamic principles money can earn a return only by being employed productively, rather than being allowed to feed on itself in financial markets.

"When an Islamic bank lends money, it shares the risks and rewards undertaken by the borrower. The bank's rate of return depends on the financial success of its clients," he says.

Depositors can enter into contracts with banks, similar to the Western concept of share capital, whereby their money is lent to a third party engaged in profit-earning activities.

The depositors then share the profits the bank receives from these activities. This adaptation of Islamic principles to modern banking has seen the rapid development of Islamic financial institutions, starting with the Dubai Islamic Bank in 1975.

Since the early 1980s two large Islamic groups have been formed, Al Baraka (the only Islamic bank in South Africa since the collapse of the local Islamic Bank) and Dar Mal Al Islami.

Latest available figures, to the end of 1997, show a total of 176 Islamic banks around the world, with total capital of more than $7,3-billion and total assets of about $148-billion.

But the really fascinating, and according to Dr Hussein Kamel Fahmi confusing, concept to debate in Islamic economics is insurance.

Fahmi, a senior researcher at the Islamic Research and Training Institute in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, says while contemporary Islamic society faces the same types of risk that prevail in Western countries, the problem is on what basis they can be insured against.

A definition of insurance is money paid, usually on a monthly or annual basis, against an unforeseen risk that will be compensated for with money.

That definition, says Fahmi, is not acceptable under Islamic practice (though some scholars have argued in favour of it) because it implies money producing money, which in turn evokes the prohibition of Riba.

Islam also recognises two sets of commodity items, gold and silver (and by analogy bank notes) and soft commodities like dates, wheat, barley and salt.

Among other Islamic rules governing commercial exchanges between these sets of commodities is one that stipulates that commodities exchanged in the same class must be settled at a spot price, and immediately.

So bank notes, like the payment of insurance premiums, cannot be made on the basis of receiving compensation for a loss in the form of bank notes at a future date.

That, says Fahmi, poses one of the main problems for applying the Western insurance system to Islamic society. But in some non-Islamic countries Muslims have been forced to be pragmatic and use insurance companies.

There is also a growing trend of Muslim syndicates being formed to offer a basic form of insurance for members.

However, with more than a fifth of the world's population following Islamic principles -- more than a billion people -- a massive market must exist for an insurance group innovative enough to produce a system of insurance that complies with Islam.

-- The Mail & Guardian, September 21, 1999. -

Material on the Daily Mail&Guardian site may not be republished without permission.

Fair use - for education and discussion purposes only.

153 posted on 12/25/2001 4:38:33 PM PST by pttttt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crowned One
bttt
154 posted on 12/26/2001 3:32:22 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Parmy
bttt
155 posted on 12/26/2001 9:44:37 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
People can create their own wealth without having to try to take it from others.

I know a Lebanese family that's been in the USA for three generations. Grandpa made a huge fortune here. HUGE. They're lovely people. Very charitable, build hospitals for their communities, etc. My friends, I thought. BUT! When I read a publication put out by a Lebanese association, it featured an article on how awful it was that they were cut off from selling opium from Lebanon. And in a conversation at their dinner table, this highly educated millionaire family discussed how unfair it was that they could not add to their fortune with drug sales. Incredible!

156 posted on 12/26/2001 9:54:26 AM PST by PoisedWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PoisedWoman
bump for all the newbies to read this!!
157 posted on 12/26/2001 9:56:45 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: PoisedWoman
bump for all the newbies to read this!!
158 posted on 12/26/2001 9:58:06 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: pttttt
Good and fascinating research. Thanks. You might be interested in my little sidebar to this, post #156, which I posted before reading your material.
159 posted on 12/26/2001 9:59:03 AM PST by PoisedWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: tybalt
bttt
160 posted on 12/26/2001 9:59:35 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-318 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson