Posted on 11/17/2001 5:40:18 PM PST by t-shirt
WIRE: 11/17/2001 8:49 pm ET
In Mexico, Daschle, Gephardt give strongest support yet to more open borders, immigration reform
The Associated Press
MEXICO CITY (AP) Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle and House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt said Saturday that they would forge ahead with immigration reform early next year, including some kind of legal residency for Mexican migrants already living in the United States. Such reforms "are very consistent with fighting against terrorism," Gephardt, D-Mo., told a news conference after meeting with President Vicente Fox during the congressmen's three-day trip to Mexico.
"If you are regularizing status, you are also understanding the people you are dealing with are not terrorists," Gephardt said, noting that those who would benefit are "people who have been in the United States for a long time, paid taxes, obeyed the laws and been very good citizens."
Daschle said discussion on the reforms could be held during the next congressional session early next year. He said legalization would not be equivalent to a broad amnesty, and would require a background check and investigation.
"The opportunity for us to investigate and expel those who ought not be there is something we want to deal with, too," he added.
The two lawmakers also said they were interested in a European Union-style program of public investments and a more open border.
"I think that it ought to be our goal that we have a free pass border at some point in the future," Daschle said.
Daschle's office later said he was not endorsing any particular program, but rather supported having the same freedoms on the Mexican border as those that exist on the Canadian border. Canadians do not need visas to enter the United States, but Mexicans do.
"I think it's unlikely that we will obtain that goal anytime in the short term," Daschle said. "(But) if the United States and Canada have a border like that, we ought to have the opportunity to have that kind of border with Mexico as well."
Fox, facing trouble at home on both economic and political fronts, desperately needs to make some headway on gaining better treatment for Mexican migrants to the United States, a central policy goal of his administration.
Daschle and Gephardt said Mexico's concerns hadn't fallen from the U.S. agenda in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
"Our commitment (to bilateral issues) is every bit as strong as what it was on Sept. 10," Daschle said, noting that Congress is expected to vote in the next few days to suspend "for at least one year" an anti-drug certification program that has angered Mexicans.
The certification procedure required the State Department to judge other countries' anti-drug efforts and threatened the loss of financial aid for nations that failed the test.
Mexicans, and many other Latin Americans, considered that an affront to their sovereignty.
free republic is famous for that.
while i'd agree that legality would be preferable, sadly, both parties, democrat and republican, have allowed the defacto immigration policy to build.
the need for immigration is due to the baby boomer generation and successive generations that have chosen not to have children. the u.s. birth rate dropped in the 1960s.
by the late 1970s, the u.s. birth rate fell to 1.8 or so, where 2.0 is replacement of two adults.
it was in the 1980s and 90s that illegal immigration grew as a result.
the american economy requires a slightly higher-than-replacement birth rate to function.
now, the birth rate has risen to 2.2 or so.
why blame other people for our choice not to have children?
Ken21 always plays the race card on every thread of this sort. If you disagree with him, you're a racist. He ignores the real issues of unlimited illegal immigration, then plays the race card.
isn't that racism?
Fortunately, G.W. has your number and will clean your clocks in 2K+2 and 2K+4.
It's not only Canadians who cross that border; many of the terrorists come in that way. As do many illegal immigrants from European and Asian countries.
the reason I brought up the language is because it keeps people from assimilating....and the Latinos I have met make it an issue. You yourself think I am racist because I think people who immigrate should learn English. Why? When my great-grandfather immigrated from Germany, he learned English. Why should Latinos not? The US speaks English....if they want to be accepted here, they should learn to do the same. It is not our job to adapt to new arrivals.
The premise that is at the heart of argument. Many would argue that that time has long past.
Correction:
when you and your buds call for 8,300,000 illegal immigrants to be deported...that's not racism.
and, yes, mexican nationals do buy in san diego. why do mexicans buy in san diego? because the prices on some items are cheaper; the same reason that americans go to mexico.
also, preferences.
People from most European countries don't need visas to come here. Neither do Canadians, Aussies or Kiwis. I don't know what your criteria for "illegal" is, but most likely few of those people are really illegal.
Most Africans can get here on special classes of visas. Mexicans and So. Americans have the hardest time being admitted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.