Posted on 11/16/2001 1:26:59 PM PST by Notwithstanding
3 to 4.5 boys victimized per homosexual male while 1 girl is victimized per 11 heterosexual males
CRESTWOOD, KY, November 14, 2001 (LSN.ca) - An important research paper by Dr. Judith Reisman, demonstrates with statistics from the 1992 US Statistical Abstracts that the 'gay' population contains a vast subset which "commits multiple, repeated child sex offenses."
Dr. Reisman is the famous psychologist who discovered that the main body of research which led to the sexual revolution was fraudulent. In her seminal work on the father of modern sexology, Alfred Kinsey, Reisman showed that Kinsey paid pedophiles to sexually experiment with children as young as 2 years of age. Kinsey later used that "data" to give impetus to pedophilia by claiming that children are sexual from birth.
Reisman cites the 1992 Statistical Abstract of the United States saying that 6 to 8 million boys are sexually victimized by members of the approximately 2 million-strong gay community in the US (2% of the adult male population in the US). Comparatively, the statistics indicate that 9% of the heterosexual adult male population of approximately 87 million are responsible for the victimization of 8 million girls. Thus the ratio shows 3 to 4.5 boys are victimized per homosexual male while 1 girl is victimized per 11 heterosexual males. Reisman concludes that since not all homosexuals males sexually assault boys, a "'gay' subset commits multiple, repeated child sex offenses," each with an average number of victims above 4.
Reisman's full report "Crafting Gay Children" can be found at: http://rsvpamerica.org/crafting%20august%202001.htm#_edn93
See also the RSVP home page: http://rsvpamerica.org
You should have read the next paragraph were she shows that the 100% needs to be adjusted downward.
You aren't the first poster to suggest that. Maybe you'd like to be the first one to prove it?
-----------------------
Some gays use marriage as a mask to hide their condition from the outside world. Others may attempt marriage hoping it will cure them of their condition.
Some years ago I had remote contact with a man who told his wife he was gay four days before she was to deliver their first child. He then headed for San Francisco.
Please show me where I have defended the practice - I called for pedophiles to be shot earlier in the thread. I am saying that sloppy scholarship is not the best way to win this war, and IMO this researcher engages in such.
Why put there in the first place? It's stupid and will just alienate gays who might be willing to help fight the pedophiles among them...
Strawmanstrawmanstrawmanstrawman. She specifically recognizes that not all gays are pedophiles.
-bc
However, Flynt did allow a cartoon called "Chester the Molester", which was entirely about "humerous" situations in which an older man abducted or induced pre-adolescents into having sex with him. I heard a rumour that the cartoonist was busted for child sexual molestation, but do not know for sure.
Then why put that kind of crap into a study? The left is always looking for us to make factual errors - and the 100% clearly insinuates that all gays are pedophiles. That's just giving the other side ammo.
Look, I'm on your side here - but I question the use of these kind of tactics. There is plenty of solid, concrete information out there that clearly demonstrates the problem of gay pedophiles without folks posting hyperbolic stuff because it says what they want to believe.
I assume you mean 30% of all molested children. Meaning, of course, that 70% of all children are molested by heterosexuals. Therefore to have the largest impact on preventing child molestation, heterosexuals should be exterminated. Do the math.
Perverts all.
I don't know whay that is in the list or what it means, exactly. But I do know she said two sentences earlier that not all homosexuals are pedophiles.
-bc
I have seen that exact snippet or something very close to it lifted out of context by a freeper to claim that all homosexuals are pedophiles. Why put something like that in there? I just don't understand what she's trying to achieve here - IMO it's counterproductive.
What can I say? There's only so much you can do with people who will judge something based upon a single sentence when the very next line would have explained it!
You remind me of a guy who used to go around suggesting that the Earth would be a better place if 80% of the human race simply vanished.
No one took him seriously either.
Bullets are expensive. Rope is reusable.
FMCDH
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.