[Map Kernow]

Most crashes are a combination of factors which, on their own would not cause a crash. It is not a conspiracy, it is simply investigation.

I didn't say it was a conspiracy. I am saying that they're reaching for a comfortable explanation of Flt. 587--at least one that's more comfortable than terrorism. And they're pushing theories in our faces that sound as kooky and far-fetched as any of the anti-government conspiracy theories I've been reading about it.

[caa26]

It appears thus far, Flight 587 crashed due to gross negligence in maintaining the aircraft or some form of terrorism. Neither scenario is good for ther airline industry, so I'm not ready to say if the government is covering anything up, yet.

[Solson]

Yesterday, I was still open to the idea of terrorism and/or sabotage. But, the fact the bolts were intact close that for me.

[Tarakotchi]

"they're pushing theories in our faces that sound as kooky and far-fetched as any of the anti-government conspiracy theories I've been reading about it."

Really, what kooky and far-fetched anti-government conspiracy theories have you been reading about the crash? On FreeRepublic? Many people feel because of the timing and locale and airline it may have been another act of terrorism, is that a kooky and far-fetched conspiracy theory?