Skip to comments.
Grand jury subpoenas documents from Rep. Condit
AP ^
| 11-15-01
Posted on 11/16/2001 1:17:10 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:39:04 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 next last
To: pathan
Did you write that stuff yourself?
Got any source for your Israali agents on a roof video taping?
81
posted on
11/16/2001 1:19:56 PM PST
by
Betty Jo
To: Oldeconomybuyer; Inge_CAV; Ann Archy; uvular
Well, well!
Is the subpeona secret?
Will we ever know the documents requested?
Have we ever found out the computer hits that were "Evidentiary"?
Does anyone know anything about Chandra or Condit hanging with terrorist friends of Binny?
Will it be a hoot if Gary tries to subtley suggest that the terrs did Chandra in?
Did they kill Joyce Chang?
How about the third intern from California?
Is the psycho-sexual-serial-killer realy Binnies Boys?
I dont think so!
Try Condit under the secret new military rules!
Go Justice!
Go Heidi Pasichow!
82
posted on
11/16/2001 1:19:57 PM PST
by
Betty Jo
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Whooo Hooo! I am so glad this was posted. I got in on the tail end of the news report and wasn't sure what happened.
This is great news, I want to go hug Chandra's parents, they must be so thankful to the grand jury!
My hopes and prayers are that this slime gets found out, sooner, rather than later, as I feel he is guilty of something concerning her disappearance.
To: michaelje
LOL!
To: karth
In reading the above again, it appears to be a quote to me. It implies that he told his fellow congress members this in a disclosure about the subpoena.
Would love to know what they are asking for!
To: Diver Dave
Thanks for the ping - this is great news.
86
posted on
11/16/2001 1:20:31 PM PST
by
VaMarVet
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Good Things come to those who wait:)
Much Thanks to the Saturday Freepers, for keeping it in the minds of the people. Now, if only GC will tell the truth....
87
posted on
11/16/2001 1:20:34 PM PST
by
Pistacio
To: ladyinred
It's really not funny though.
To: Pistacio
Now, if only GC will tell the truth....NOW it will be under oath. It's a whole new ballgame.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
...For more on the Silence that is just Killing the LEVY Family see my 4 Bookmarked F/R Threads titled:
'~LORETTA SANCHEZ~ Condo Connection to ~GARY CONDIT~'
To: Oldeconomybuyer
My God, I've missed this guy. Now all I need is to see a Robert Blake story and I'll know the world is getting back to normal.
To: Vinomori
"This is a timely reminder that we have some E V I L D O E R S here at home that we have not smoked out just yet."
An astute observation!
To: Diver Dave
BIG BUMP
93
posted on
11/16/2001 1:21:45 PM PST
by
FallGuy
To: pathan
Rock Creek Park, a large, forested area which is shaped like a goat's headthe hideous head of Baphomet, the Masonic goat-god, representative of the coming antichrist. Ooooooooooookay, then.
94
posted on
11/16/2001 1:22:01 PM PST
by
Plummz
To: Eroteme
The reuters story seemed to imply the subpoena was for documents from his House office. This could include things such as his calendar, etc. . .
95
posted on
11/16/2001 1:22:01 PM PST
by
Plummz
To: Diver Dave
NOW it will be under oath. It's a whole new ballgame. If he was involved in her murder why would he tell the truth ? It's obvious he has obfiscated or lied all along. His conscience is seared with a hot iron.
To: Plummz
LOL!
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Rep. Condit Served with Grand Jury Subpoena .....on a toasted hot dog bun smothered in fresh reporters
Mmmm, mmm good!
98
posted on
11/16/2001 1:22:09 PM PST
by
smorgle
To: uvular
Hear, hear!! (pounding of shoe on table)
The other good news: if this is what AP's reporting/selling, what does that tell us about how much this country has recovered since 9/11?
99
posted on
11/16/2001 1:22:14 PM PST
by
smorgle
To: ladyinred
No, its not a quote or it would be in quotation marks, "I am considering whether to comply with the subpoena." IN FACT, the reporter could have written this without Condit saying anything at all. Once the subpoena has gone out, a reporter can say Condit is "considering" whether to comply with it. The sentence means nothing except to bias the reader against Condit. Its dishonest reporting to phrase like that but Condit is a public figure; he can't sue for libel or slander so he's an easy target for tricks.
100
posted on
11/16/2001 1:22:48 PM PST
by
karth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson