Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarkWar
MarkWar, if the ChiComs tried to come in by container ship,about the only thing you'd have to do is destroy the port facility they're using. Container ships require specialized gear to unload, and it is not done in a hurry.

And as for my motives, good sir, I have found over the years that when people spout BS unopposed on any forum, pretty soon the BS is believed before reality is.

BTW, thank you for questioning my integrity--innuendo is typically the last refuge of the scumbag, and it's nice to see your true colors.

100 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:13 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
(1) MarkWar, if the ChiComs tried to come in by container ship,about the only thing you'd have to do is destroy the port facility they're using. Container ships require specialized gear to unload, and it is not done in a hurry.
(2) And as for my motives, ... BTW, thank you for questioning my integrity--innuendo is typically the last refuge of the scumbag, and it's nice to see your true colors.

(1) This is a great example of what I'm talking about, Poohbah. IF you're going to war with somebody, THEN you wouldn't have to use specialized docks & gear to unload a container ship. You'd just beach the wretched things and blow the effing hull apart and charge off of it... (Or, if you're sneaking people in, then a great deal of unloading happens at night and containers are NEVER opened at the dock, so it hardly matters if it takes special equipment or a long time -- you just offload the containers to trucks/trains, and trans-ship them to someplace where the people can unload at their leisure...)

(2) I didn't mean to make any comments via innuendo. I meant to flat out say it: I think you're some kind of pro or semi-pro disrupter who hangs out here to squash speculations and keep discussions within "acceptable" bounds by ridiculing people who either insightfully or accidently stumble upon a wild truth. (However I wasn't attacking your integrity -- I assume people who engage in such activity believe strongly in their values and have the passion to act on them. I just personally don't like attacking creative thought in an open forum for any reason.)

Mark W.

102 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:15 PM PST by MarkWar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah
Guess I didn't realize you had such a COMPREHENSIVE, PhD level, exhaustive, thorough, deep, broad understanding of BS with which to make such refined discrimminations about what qualifies and what doesn't.

I assume, though, that it's a lot easier to just label everything outside your biases and experience as BS. . . . though given your claims to integrity, I wonder how you sleep at nights.

You have yet to offer an alternate plausible explanation for such huge numbers of inputs of such consistency from such a diversity of sources. HOW DO YOU EVEN EXPLAIN IT IN YOUR MIRROR???

Certainly the Chicoms will have challenges reaching our shores in numbers. . . but given their pride, they probably are not setting themselves up for wholesale failure. . . I suspect there are other factors besides Bimbo Crusher's devastating our military. . . . other factors which will assist the Chicom's efforts to do us in.

Imagine that the reports on their presence on our Mexican border are true. . . . that their presence with missles in Cuba is true. . . WHAT MIGHT THEY BE UP TO? Movie making?

Now THAT'S BS.

109 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:34 PM PST by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson