Posted on 11/16/2001 1:05:27 PM PST by DCE
Freedom From War- State Department Document 7277
Please remember that in light of the news of President Bush telling Vladmir Putin he is cutting our Nuclear arsenal whether he cuts it or not is very bad. If you do a search on the State Department site, or just a normal search on MSN, you will find a document titled Freedom From War- State Department Document 7277- Blueprint for Peace.
People, I beg of you to read this. It has been revised 21 times and strengthened since 1961. It was originally read on the floor of the UN by JFK on 9/25/1962. This has not been stopped. If you wonder why the reductions are going on, or other strange things our occurring, just read this. I do not accept what a person tells me as fact. Only the document from the source will do. I can assure you also, that we are almost through the second stage mentioned in this document.
I am very sad that GW is going through with this document, as I had the misfortune of living in Fort Lauderdale the last two years, and voted for him. I did not like Gore, or the other Leftists that were running. I am really down about the FTAA agreement being carried through as well. Many of you do not know much about this, but in essence it takes all of the North American countries and makes them into a Free trade area exactly as you see in the EU. It will be called the OAS. You may do a search for this document by putting the Title "Words Into Deeds" into your search engine as well. The thing most disturbing about this among the other socialist garbage that runs through it, is the fact that the borders of all countries from Northern Canada to Costa Rica will come down. Cuba is the only country left out of this at this time. Why has this not been reversed in light of what is currently happening to our beloved country??
I have spent roughly the last 6 years reading many International treaties, and they take many hours. America, we are in serious trouble. Treaties that many of you will want to review are the Millenium Declaration, Our Global Neighborhood, Treaty on Reform, ICC Treaty from June 18th 1998 (Titled Plenipotentiary), and the Anti Gun treaties that are in existence since then.
The only way that I have been able to get through to people is by showing them the facts. These treaties are straight from www.un.org. I wish all the best, and God Bless All! If any of you need help in finding these, please email me, and I will provide the links etc.
http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A22127-2001Nov13.html Notice something about this???
We don't need to export our labor, manufacturing, engineering, agriculture, etc. to accomplish this. In fact, doing so is dangerous and lines up with the actual globalization plans of the socialists. In essence, the major cog in their plan is simple ... neutralize America.
If other nations want to emulate us and create their own "free enterprise" ... then great. To do so, they will have to first free their people so that their creativity and desire to achieve is maximized. Either way, let them come here to the "bonanza" market and let them pay a price to do business here. (Meaning they must conform to our standards or go some where else.) There is no place else as lucrative, so my guess is that most would conform if we would simply remove the fetters and insure that the "free trade" is "fair" to the American business/farmer/manufacturer/etc. I don't care if the other people don't think it is fair ... they'll pay the price for admission IMHO.
Just my view after visiting a number of these countries involved with our so called "free trade" and consulting with firms on setting up manufactuiring and engineering business there.
Regards.
No. It was a Nazi phrase previously. It meant something else, of course.
To make absolutely sure that no belligerent or antagonist nation or group of nationsn ever even considers the option. So that they will know, without a shadow of a doubt, that from the land, from the air and from the sea, they will suffer five times over whatever they develop and consider dishing out to us.
For this reason, our Trident nuclear deterrent should remain strong at 18 ships all with Trident II D-5 missiles. We should have two or three times as many B-2 and B1-B's and we should have the Peacekeepr numbers increased with a mobile version deployed.
Once SDI is in place and shown to work reliabily, we may then consider cutting back a portion of our triad. Not until IMHO and then only the oldest weapons.
My position is that we should maintain an unassailable position from which we can operate and bow or posture or disarm for no man or nation.
Just my opinion.
We have newer technology, but a lot less of it and it costs a lot more and may not be as "unassailable" as we want to imagine when faced with a truly committed foe (hint: Iraq wasn't).
Other than those minor points, your reasoning makes perfect sense.
"Speak softly and carry a big stick" ... is still an excellent philosophy.
to all you numb SHEEPLE, SOCCER MOMS, YUPPIES and NASDAQ CHASERS out there ... Prepare yourselves for the One World Order .....
LEARN IT, LIVE IT, LOVE IT !!!!
Oh how what a beautiful view from behind a FEMA chainlink fence !!!!!!
I address that in my novel:
Dragon's Fury - Breath of Fire
Regards.
.... maybe somewhere in-between --- B-rated-Sci-Fi-N.W.O. type
--- only one detail I haven't figured out yet --- is the Red Cross giving the "extra" blood to the "reptilians/dracos" or the "greys" ?
is the Red Cross giving the "extra" blood to the "reptilians/dracos" or the "greys" ?
I thought it was being given to the pinstripers...or at the least to the candystripers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.