To: Poohbah
"Differentiating between someone who is a defender of the Constitution and someone
who is a "defender" of the Constitution requires judgement and discrimination--"
Maybe you havn't noticed, but both tend to be in short supply where
the fed is concerned. As I pointed out to dane (and as Travis McGee
pointed out) this is as open-ended as they CHOOSE to make it.
We can see how this worked in Nazi Germany, Stalin's Russia, and Mao's China.
You can be declared an "enemy of the state" at the discression of the federal (or local) police.
And now it takes VERY little to be branded as such.
210 posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:16 PM PST by
freefly
To: freefly
And the winner for Most Rediculous Comment of The Day is!!!
"Differentiating between someone who is a defender of the Constitution and someone who is a "defender" of the Constitution requires judgement and discrimination--"
253 posted on
11/16/2001 1:13:32 PM PST by
Verax
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson