Please stop posting this CLICHE.
Speaking of "facts," how 'bout the fact that there were "no signs of engine failure" so far in the Fl. 587 investigation? Did you read the top of the thread? Confused about what new theory you're going to throw at us "tinfoil hat crowd" "consistent with an explanation that mechanical failure caused the crash of Fl. 587" if your prime "uncontained catastrophic engine failure" theory isn't supported by the evidence?
Want to borrow my tinfoil hat for a second, bub?