Replies

"I have yet to see a single Freeper say, "it was clearly an accident, no chance of sabotage, end of story". On the flip side, I've seen *dozens* of Freepers firmly conclude that it was sabotage, period, anyone who disagrees must be an idiot sheeple, blah blah blah."

EggsAckley.

Those of us who have been serious about this haven't called anyone names for not agreeing that this is most likely sabatage, but I have seen any theory that doesn't parrot the NTSB/Pataki line being made fun of regardless of how accurate our input has been. We have taken great pains to engage their disinformation with actual information, most of which would have blown right by many Americans with little or no knowledge of this particular plane, and even the mistaken reports by journalists like the engine with the most amount of hours being the one the NTSB had pinpointed as the likely source of the crash. Look. A lot of us are trying really hard to keep up with each and every report and to post on this forum, with as much accuracy as we can, why their reports are wrong, and why some of them are definitely foolish...IF you know the plane and its capabilities.
So far, we have been ahead of even the NTSB in posting here why the original explanation they tried to float did not hold water, literally or figuratively.
Whether their explanation was from preconceptions or whether it was meant to soothe those already traumatized, the fact is, they were wrong.
Bottom line, if I see something wrong, it doesn't take a tinfoil hat to know it, and No disrespect intended to those who would rather sit back and wait for whatever explanation they finally decide is the *right* one, some of us had/have questions, and we will continue to ask them, whether you make fun of us or not. We aren't asking these questions for YOU. We are asking them for the truth.