[copycat]

The original post...

But until I see some viable arguments to prove a conspiracy/terrorist influence, I will believe that a mechanical malfunction was the cause for the loss of 255 + innocent lives.

Seems to me YOUR side is jumping to conclusions while our side is merely raising possibilities.

[mlo]

The whole idea that there are "sides" for mechanical explanations or terrorist ones is the problem! I'm on no "side". I'm not offering an explanation for the crash. I will see what the evidence is as it develops. What I'm talking about is people who can't do that, a point you've aptly demonstrated by putting yourself on a "side".

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

Way I see it there is no reason to it was mechanical failure at this point.

May be, but let's see some facts and see what is on the voice recorder.

Some of the things sited as evidence of mechanical failure aren't mutually exclusive. They do not eliminate the possibility of a terrorist incident yet, as some seem to suggest.

[katze]

Seems to me YOUR side is jumping to conclusions while our side is merely raising possibilities.

49 posted on 11/12/01 5:28 PM Pacific by copycat

Can't speak for mlo or others, but what bothers me is the comments about the Govt lying to the public. If this is a terrorist deed, I believe Pres Bush will tell us, but only after they *know* what happened. If the enemy is reading FR, why give them the idea they are winning a psychological war against us? My guess is they are reading, and I'll tell them they can kiss my German butt, because our military is going to kick theirs.