Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ScholarWarrior
The object in question is more if that was the intent, and if they knew that. Personally I think whoever is responsible got more of a result than they ever expected.

How is the structure weaker at the top? The only explanation I can think of is the asbestos issue, which I don't know to be true or not. Would there be extra support columns in the lower portions that did not extend to the higher leves?
283 posted on 11/12/2001 3:58:43 PM PST by Not Fooled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]


To: Not Fooled
Absolutely lighter and less rigid as you go up.
It has to be, otherwise it does not sway, and therefore could not withstand the wind shear.
Think pine tree.
286 posted on 11/12/2001 4:03:05 PM PST by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson