To: June2
"They knew where to hit the building to weaken its structure."
If the object was to bring the towers down, don't you think they would have come in even lower and tried to hit it as far down as they possibly could, so there would be more weight resting on a weakened structure below?
Knew where to hit it indeed. I don't suppose you have some testimony and/or evidence which supports this theory?
To: Not Fooled
Actually there are two responses re: lower down question.
1. They tried in 1993 lower down and the US provided a good analysis of why that didn't work.
I'm sure they read it.
2. If I recall correctly, the building architect said on Sep 12 or 13 that the structure was weaker higher up because it could be.
By the way, that architect was asked by some jack**s reporter
why didn't the buildings stand up?
He answered why did they stand for as long as they did?
That singular fact probably saved 20,000 lives.
To: Not Fooled
If the object was to bring the towers down, don't you think they would have come in even lower and tried to hit it as far down as they possibly could, so there would be more weight resting on a weakened structure below? Bet they wanted to, but all the durn big buildings there in NY got in the way, partner.
P.S. They not only wanted to bring the towers down but they did.
C'mon, partner, tell me you was just funnin' with that post?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson