Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nicmarlo
I wonder if Arab mechanics are responsible.

I'm thinking the same thing. After following this event all morning, and following this thread,
these are the observations I have made.

1. The wing was broken off and fuel in the wing dumped into the water.

2. To call it "mechanical failure" merits a great big DUH!
OBVIOUSLY THE MECHANICS ON THAT PLANE FAILED, the question is "why."

3. There was not enough time in the four minutes that the plane was airborne for the pilot to detect
mechanical failure AND dump fuel.

4. I don't believe a terrorist was on the plane, or if there was one, I don't believe he went to the cockpit.
NTSB stated that the checked baggage had been "passenger matched," which they naively believed, in the past, that NO ONE would put a bomb in their luggage and THEN board the plane,
knowing they would die. NOW we know that they would.

5. Just because the 9/11 terrorists used the planes as missiles does not mean they would
use the same MO on another "hit." More likely they would change their MO for every event,
just to keep us guessing.

6. There is no doubt that many in the ground crew/mechanics/baggage handlers/plane cleaners
etc. are likely to be middle eastern, and have excellent opportunities to
sabotage any plane they like.

7. The LAST thing that American AND Pataki would want us to know is that
the ground crews are so poorly screened. They have been doing their
big dog and pony show for the last 2 months, trying to convince us that we are safe,
at this point, they don't want us to undo their newly created safety myths by having us suspect the ground crew.

146 posted on 11/12/2001 1:20:48 PM PST by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: EggsAckley
Re: Your post #146. You made some great observations (I thought of a few of those myself). And I agree with all your points, especially:

5. Just because the 9/11 terrorists used the planes as missiles does not mean they would use the same MO on another "hit." More likely they would change their MO for every event, just to keep us guessing.

6. There is no doubt that many in the ground crew/ mechanics/baggage handlers/plane cleaners etc. are likely to be middle eastern, and have excellent opportunities to sabotage any plane they like.


180 posted on 11/12/2001 1:42:45 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley
4. I don't believe a terrorist was on the plane, or if there was one, I don't believe he went to the cockpit. NTSB stated that the checked baggage had been "passenger matched," which they naively believed, in the past, that NO ONE would put a bomb in their luggage and THEN board the plane, knowing they would die. NOW we know that they would.

If they'll fly themselves into a building knowing that they'll surely die, why wouldn't they blow up a plane using their luggage? The NTSB's "logic" on this one isn't anywhere near logical.

234 posted on 11/12/2001 2:20:51 PM PST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley
6. There is no doubt that many in the ground crew/mechanics/baggage handlers/plane cleaners etc. are likely to be middle eastern, and have excellent opportunities to sabotage any plane they like.

This was my first thought when I heard that an engine had fallen off. My sick mind then went on to it being open season on these people and was promptly slapped on the knunkles for even thinking this was anything but an accident by my fellow co-workers who have flight plans over the holidays. I would really like to see who had access to this plane before it took off.

316 posted on 11/12/2001 8:15:29 PM PST by boxerblues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson