Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steven W.
Wouldn't you be dumping fuel if right after takeoff, you realized you would have to make emeregency landing? Landing with full fuel would be problematic.
123 posted on 11/12/2001 1:09:02 PM PST by ontos-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ontos-on
Landing with full fuel would be problematic.

Yeh, but according to previous posts, the Airbus 300-600 has no fuel dumping capacity. They would HAVE to land with a full tank.

131 posted on 11/12/2001 1:12:27 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Paul Czysz, an aviation specialist at Parks College of St. Louis University, said the circular hole in the side of an engine that fell from the doomed airliner is suspicious. Czysz said jet engines of the type on the A-300 are designed to contain any debris from a turbine blade failure. In a catastrophic, uncontained failure involving sheared turbine blades, he said, there likely would be more engine damage than apparent in the engine on the ground.

Cyzsz said that if the engine had fallen from the plane as a result of failure in its attachment bolts, he also would expect to see more substantial damage than was apparent in pictures of the engine on the ground.

161 posted on 11/12/2001 1:28:38 PM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson