Sorry, I'm not palying that game. It hasn't been 12 hours. There is no evidence there was a missile or a bomb. Unless you have first-hand knowledge of the scene and the remains of the aircraft, your opinion is as dubious as the next.
Play your little game of semantics if you wish, theory vs. possibility. I'm interested in FACTS and YOU don't have any.
I never said: "there was a missile or a bomb." which you imply I said. What I have said repeatedly is the eye witnesses-who were there--said (on national TV) that there was an explosion or a fireball.
Why do you attribute things to me that I haven't said?
Simply to avoid discussing the fact that you outrageously want others to believe that all the numerous eyewitness are wrong in what they saw today with their own eyes--that didn't really see what happened? And that the government line that there was no explosion and it was an accident--be-damned-the-witnesses-testimony is the only possibily point-blank-end-of-discussion?????