Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: undergroundwarrior
"Come on. Be serious. Or at least wait for some evidence."

When an incident is "covered up," you don't see the evidence. That's why they call it a "cover up," I'm told.

General Meyers, on all TV networks in an interview recently, stated that the al Qaeda terrorits have "300 to 400 Stinger missiles." (anti-aircraft missiles) I'm not saying it was a Stinger, yet.

893 posted on 11/12/2001 11:54:05 AM PST by Terrorista Nada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 880 | View Replies ]


To: Terrorista Nada
Correct me if I am wrong: Wouldn't a stinger missile leave a smoke trail??? Wouldn't a stinger missile be visible on radar screens???

Even if the government covered it up, wouldn't average people be blabbering to the press???

Besides, wouldn't a terrorist attack be more beneficial than a mechanical failure??? A mechanical failure would cause major overhauls of all Airbus 300 planes and destroy the airline industry. A terrorist attack would result in "tighter security measures". A terrorist attack would not destroy the insurance industry the same way as would a mechanical failure.

895 posted on 11/12/2001 12:01:38 PM PST by undergroundwarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 893 | View Replies ]

To: Terrorista Nada
( mulitible browsers, reading other posts....)One question, How could they possibly know already, and actually right after the crash, that it was not a terrorist attack?

Whenever the plane paieces were still scorching and too hot to touch, we were reassured that there was no evidence that this was a terrorist attack.

896 posted on 11/12/2001 12:03:35 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 893 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson