[Joe Hadenuf]

If this statement from the FBI regarding an explosion on board is true, this is not good. Ask yourself why the FBI at this point would make such a statement? Prior knowledge perhaps?

[nicmarlo]

If this statement from the FBI regarding an explosion on board is true, this is not good. Ask yourself why the FBI at this point would make such a statement? Prior knowledge perhaps?

I agree. But maybe not even prior knowledge...after the fact knowledge. Why else have divers searching, locking up the bay, closing tunnels? Reminds me of 9/11.

[eno_]

If this statement from the FBI regarding an explosion on board is true, this is not good. Ask yourself why the FBI at this point would make such a statement? Prior knowledge perhaps?

How about common sense? Wings do not separate without A LOT OF CONVINCING. Of course there was an explosion on board, and there were multiple witnesses. It's Peter Jennings with his "no evidence of terrorism" BS (this is AFTER the witnesses were interviewed) who has his head up his ass.

[Hamilton2]

Could it be that the fighter jets saw the explosion? Seems to me they might have had a visual on it and the FBI is just getting this corroborated.

[nicmarlo]

If this statement from the FBI regarding an explosion on board is true, this is not good. Ask yourself why the FBI at this point would make such a statement? Prior knowledge perhaps?

I agree. But maybe not even prior knowledge...after the fact knowledge. Why else have divers searching, locking up the bay, closing tunnels? Reminds me of 9/11.

[Ragtime Cowgirl]

If this statement from the FBI regarding an explosion on board is true, this is not good. Ask yourself why the FBI at this point would make such a statement? Prior knowledge perhaps?

Probably the same FBI mole who's been spreading disinformation and anti-Bush spin to his/her liberal press contacts. I say we smoke 'em out.